A Study on Blended Teaching Models Based on Symbiosis Theory: Taking Shipping-Related Course Instruction as an Example

Authors

  • Ming Sun Shanghai Maritime University
  • Xitong Pan Shanghai Maritime University
  • Kebiao Yuan Ningbo University of Technology
  • Midakpe P. Vortia Shanghai Maritime University
  • Yutong Sun No.2 High School of East China Normal University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62177/jetp.v3i1.1024

Keywords:

Symbiosis Theory, Blended Learning, Online-Offline Integration, Maritime Studies

Abstract

This study aims to address the persistent gap between theoretical teaching and practical application, as well as the discord between online and offline learning environment in shipping-related course instruction currently. Guided by symbiosis theory, this study proposes a novel blended teaching model that integrates the strengths of both online and offline instruction. It first analyzes the characteristics of the shipping course combining strong practicality with theoretical foundation, international scope with regulatory compliance, comprehensive coverage with interdisciplinary focus, and applied skills with career orientation. It also identifies prevailing "non-symbiotic" issues such as teaching-learning imbalance, imbalance between curricula and industry competency demands, and inflexible assessment methods. Subsequently, a modular and hierarchical curriculum framework was developed based on symbiosis theory. An integrated teaching system was designed where "online supports offline learning, and offline reinforcing online learning," incorporating maritime emergencies into classroom instruction with the focus of enhancing students' emergency response capabilities. Research findings indicate that this model promotes positive interaction and collaborative development among teaching elements, and significantly improves the quality of maritime talent cultivation. This study demonstrates that symbiosis-driven blended instruction offers a feasible and impactful approach towards advancing pedagogical reform in maritime disciplines.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dong, L., Xu, T. M., & Xu, G. C. (2024). Fundamental characteristics and advancement pathways of integrated urban-rural development in the context of Chinese modernization. Chinese Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 1–8.

Zheng, F. X., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Empowerment alone is not enough: Fostering both knowledge and aspiration—Cultural symbiosis in group-based schooling: A case study of Beijing No. 2 High School's Arxan branch. Chinese Journal of Education, (S1), 13–15, 130.

Lu, J. (2002). People in relationships: An anthropological inquiry into contemporary moral education. Educational Research, (1), 3–9.

Wu, X. R. (2011). Educational paradigms in the light of symbiosis theory. Educational Research, 32(1), 50–54.

Zhao, B., & Yang, Y. (2018). Challenges and reflections on the development of inclusive education in China from the perspective of symbiosis theory. Journal of Teacher Education, 5(6), 1–7.

Zhang, J. T., & Lei, J. H. (n.d.). Between ideal and reality: How to break through the development dilemma of preschool inclusive education? — A perspective based on symbiosis theory. Contemporary Education Forum, 1–12. Retrieved November 12, 2025

Lee, Y., Choi, J., & Park, J. (2025). The effectiveness of a public design demonstration module for elementary education based on symbiosis. International Journal of Asia Digital Art and Design, 29(2), 35–44.

Ling, L. (2024). Research on the path of integration of industry and education in vocational education from the perspective of "symbiosis" theory. Frontiers in Educational Research, 7(8), 166–170.

Martin, S. (2007). Where practice and theory intersect in the chemistry classroom: using cogenerative dialogue to identify the critical point in science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(4), 693–720.

Wu, Y. X., & Wang, T. (2022). Dilemmas and breakthroughs in the integrated development of urban and rural education from the perspective of symbiosis theory. Chinese Journal of Educational Technology, (11), 61–67.

Zhang, H. M., Hu, F. G., & Xie, K. (2014). Innovative application and collaborative development of educational information technology: Insights from the 2013 International Forum on Educational Technology. China Distance Education, (5), 88–92.

Yang, Y. X., Huang, J. Y., & Wu, Z. X. (2015). Implementation plan design for blended online-offline teaching models. Research on Curriculum and Education, (5), 3–4.

Ma, R. (2023). Current status and construction strategies for harmonious teacher-student relationships in blended online-offline teaching: A case study of teacher-student relationships in the Chinese International Education Program at a University in Jiangxi. Journal of Jilin Institute of Engineering and Technology, 39(5), 38–41.

Li, X. Y., Ma, X. H., & Ding, Z. H. (2024). Reform and exploration of blended online-offline teaching model for "Modern Control Theory". Education and Teaching Forum, (4), 148–152.

Yuan, Y., Lin, X., & Yang, L. (2025). Blended online-offline teaching in higher education: Insights, key factors, and optimization strategies. Frontiers in Educational Research, 8(5), 143–148.

Ma, M. (2024). Data journalism course: Exploration and practice of blended teaching model. China Media Education Review, (00), 175–183.

Liu, Y., & Li, G. (2025). Analysis of the practical application and effectiveness of blended online-offline teaching models in medical education. International Journal of Social Science and Education Research, 8(7), 140–146.

Fang, Y. (2024). Exploring the effectiveness of online-offline blended teaching mode in college English teaching based on mobile education platform. Frontiers in Educational Research, 7(10), 133–141.

Li, Z. Q., Du, L., & Xia, M. (2019). Exploration and practice of a blended learning model based on SPOC: Taking the International Shipping Operations Course in Higher Vocational Education as an Example. Foreign Trade and Economic Cooperation, (12), 124–126.

Wang, X., Zhang, Y., Ge, J., et al. (2021). Content selection of general shipping education: An introductory course design. Journal of Educational Research and Policies, 3(6), 87–90.

Yu, F., Dong, H., & Li, J. M. (2016). Exploring practical shipboard teaching models for navigation instruments courses. Journal of Maritime Education Research, 33(2), 37–39.

Raftis, C. C., Hassel, V. E., & Boukani, N. L. (2025). The impact and importance of serious games in maritime education: an empirical application. Maritime Policy & Management, 52(6), 985–1004.

Tri, C., Larsen, B., Riyanto, R., et al. (2025). Empowering maritime vocational schools for sustainable leadership in port and shipping practices. BIO Web of Conferences, 175, 03002.

Morariu, R. A., Tsvetkova, A., Hellström, M., et al. (2025). Investigating educational solutions in the field of autonomous shipping at Finnish Universities. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 31, 101402.

Yuan, J., & Ouyang, X. (2025). Inheritance and innovation of maritime culture in maritime education in the era of intelligent shipping. New Explorations in Education and Teaching, 3(9), 69–71.

Downloads

How to Cite

Sun, M., Pan, X., Yuan, K., Vortia, M. P. ., & Sun, Y. (2026). A Study on Blended Teaching Models Based on Symbiosis Theory: Taking Shipping-Related Course Instruction as an Example. Journal of Educational Theory and Practice, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.62177/jetp.v3i1.1024

Issue

Section

Articles

DATE

Received: 2026-01-03
Accepted: 2026-01-08
Published: 2026-01-22