AI-Empowered Teaching of Senior High School English Practical Writing: A “5A+E” Mechanism and Five-Stage Pathway Design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62177/jetp.v3i4.1808Keywords:
Generative Artificial Intelligence, Senior High School English Teaching, Practical Writing, 5A E Model, Integration of Teaching, Learning and AssessmentAbstract
Practical writing is an important component of senior high school English teaching. he English Curriculum Standards for Senior High School (2017 edition, 2020 revision) requires students to select appropriate language forms according to the identity of the communicative partner, he occasion and the degree of formality, o as to achieve effective cross-cultural communication. owever, urrent practical writing teaching in Grade 10 still suffers from mechanical format training, eak reader awareness, nappropriate register control, nd single and delayed feedback. Although generative artificial intelligence offers new possibilities for writing instruction, existing studies have focused mainly on automated essay scoring, academic writing at the tertiary level, or continuation writing tasks, and few have systematically constructed an AI-empowered mechanism and teaching pathway for senior high school practical writing from the perspective of the integration of teaching, learning and assessment. Adopting a conceptual construction and lesson design orientation, and grounded in the cognitive process theory of writing,t he technology-enhanced language learning framework, self-efficacy theory and formative assessment theory, this study proposes a “5A+E” empowerment mechanism model, comprising Analysis, Activation, Assistance, Assessment, Adaptation, and Ethics. On this basis, a five-stage teaching pathway—context trigger, element deconstruction, AI co-writing, multi-dimensional evaluation, and reflective transfer—is designed, and a lesson on the invitation letter for the “Chinese Culture Festival” is presented. The study argues that AI can serve as a reader analyst, format validator, point generator, register regulator and evaluation embedder, moving practical writing instruction from template drilling toward authentic communication. As a theoretical construction and lesson design study, this paper has not yet been empirically tested; future action research or quasi-experimental studies are needed to validate and refine the model and pathway.
Downloads
References
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China (2020). English curriculum standards for senior high school (2017 edition, 2020 revision). People's Education Press.
Chen,Y.(2024). Focusing on reader awareness in high school English practical writing teaching practice. English Learning, (6), 37–41.
Zhang, Z. (2025). Strategies for cultivating students' “reader awareness” in high school English practical writing teaching. Zhonghua Huoye Wenxuan (Senior High School Edition), (18), 52–54.
Li, Y., Shang, L., & Xu, M. (2025). Teaching practice of human-machine collaborative feedback model promoting vocabulary use in continuation writing. English Learning, (12), 21–30.
Ouyang, F., Zheng, L., & Jiao, P. (2022). Artificial intelligence in online higher education: A systematic review of empirical research from 2011 to 2020. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7893–7925.
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education—Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), Article 39.
Xiang, Z., & Luo, X. (2026). Generative AI empowering high school English practical writing teaching. Digital Teaching in Primary and Secondary Schools, (3), 41–45.
Chi, Y. (2025). Exploring the path of AI-assisted high school English writing teaching. Creative Education Studies, (11), 215–221.
Liu, M., Zou, W., Zong, M., et al. (2025). How generative AI empowers teaching: An empirical study on middle school students' English writing teaching. China Educational Technology, (6), 70–79.
Su, Y. (2025). Using AI and digital resources to optimize junior high school English written expression teaching practice. Campus English, (15), 99–101.
Hayes, J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1–27). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. John Benjamins.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
UNESCO (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.
Pajares, F., & Johnson, M. J. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs and the writing performance of entering high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 33(2), 163–175.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jinhua Fu, Xiaodi Hou

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
DATE
Accepted: 2026-10-23
Published: 2026-11-01








