AI-Supported Reform of a Graduate New Energy Vehicle Technology Course: Integrating Multimodal Learning and Value-Oriented Education

Authors

  • Wenhao Zhu Changsha University of Science and Technology
  • Jie Su Changsha University of Science and Technology
  • Peng Liu Changsha University of Science and Technology
  • Yong Chen Changsha University of Science and Technology
  • Gang Wu Changsha University of Science and Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62177/jetp.v3i3.1639

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Multimodal Learning, Value-Oriented Education, Vehicle Engineering, Graduate Education

Abstract

The rapid development of new energy vehicles and the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in engineering practice require graduate students in vehicle engineering to reason across increasingly coupled battery, electric-drive, power-electronics, thermal-management, and control subsystems. This paper reports a design-based reform of the graduate course New Energy Vehicle Technology, undertaken to address fragmented knowledge organization, limited opportunities for open-ended system inquiry, and weak connections between technical learning and professional responsibility. The redesigned course combines a cross-subsystem knowledge graph, digital-twin and co-simulation activities, generative-AI-assisted feedback with mandatory engineering verification, multimodal representations, and project-based learning. Preliminary evaluation draws on platform logs, project work and scores, end-of-course survey responses, and instructor observations. Two representative projects—battery state-of-health estimation with vehicle-range prediction and multi-objective optimization of vehicle energy management—show how students move from component knowledge to system-level analysis and from algorithmic output to engineering judgment. Descriptive course records show that active knowledge-graph use increased from 1.2 to 4.7 queries per student per week, while more than 40% of students conducted additional multi-scenario analyses beyond the minimum requirement. The implementation also exposed uneven preparation in programming and AI-related methods and substantial computing demands for the digital-twin environment. Because the comparison cohort is historical, the findings are interpreted as preliminary rather than causal. The study contributes a course-level design logic for integrating AI-supported learning, multimodal inquiry, and value-oriented education in graduate vehicle engineering.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wang, Q., Hou, S., Wan, S., Feng, X., & Feng, H. (2025). Applying knowledge graph to interdisciplinary higher education. European Journal of Education, 60(2), 70078.

Xie, T. (2025). Development and empirical study of a multimodal educational agent system in metaverse for engineering education digital transformation. Global Education Bulletin, 2(4), 31-39.

Bower, M., & Vlachopoulos, P. A. (2018). Critical analysis of technology-enhanced learning design frameworks. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(6), 981-997.

Ma, L. (2022). New engineering, new medicine, new agriculture, new liberal arts: From educational concept to paradigm change. China Higher Education, (12), 9-11.

Li, H., & Wang, W. (2020). Human-computer learning symbiosis: On the construction of basic learning forms in the post-artificial intelligence education era. Journal of Distance Education, (2), 46-55.

Bian, Y., & Jiang, Y. (2026). AI-assisted TRIZ teaching with scaffolded fade-out: A quasi-experimental study in undergraduate mechanical engineering. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 54(3), 55.

Ariwibowo, B., Widiaty, I., Fatra, F., Mahendra, S., & Rani, H. A. D. (2026). Digital skills integration and EV technician training: Mapping core competencies and future research directions. International Journal of Training Research, 24(1).

Jie Su, Yuqi Ouyang, Lairong Yin, Zhaoyao Shi, Changjiang Zhou, Haihang Wang, Bo Hu. (2026). Advancing wind turbine gearbox durability with eco-friendly GO nanolubricants: CFD simulation-experiment synergy for understanding flow dynamics, wear suppression and surface restoration mechanisms,Tribology International, 213,111034.

Uçan, S., & Demirel Uçan, A. (2026). Generative AI in student writing: A six-level taxonomy for responsible use in higher education assessment. Journal of Academic Ethics, 24(2), 63.

Downloads

How to Cite

Zhu, W., Su, J., Liu, P., Chen, Y., & Wu, G. (2026). AI-Supported Reform of a Graduate New Energy Vehicle Technology Course: Integrating Multimodal Learning and Value-Oriented Education. Journal of Educational Theory and Practice, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.62177/jetp.v3i3.1639

Issue

Section

Articles

DATE

Received: 2026-08-16
Accepted: 2026-08-21
Published: 2026-09-03