Core Competency Development Pathways for Navigation Technology Students Oriented to the Staged Evolution of Autonomous Navigation in Intelligent Ships

Xiao Liu; Yong Wu; Cong Wang; Hua Deng

doi:10.62177/jetp.v3i2.1483

Authors

Xiao Liu Jiangsu Maritime Institute; Wuhan University of Technology
Yong Wu Jiangsu Maritime Institute
Cong Wang Jiangsu Maritime Institute
Hua Deng Jiangsu Maritime Institute

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62177/jetp.v3i2.1483

Keywords:

Intelligent Ships, Autonomous Navigation, MASS Code, Navigation Technology, Core Competencies

Abstract

The development of autonomous navigation in intelligent ships is reshaping the competency structure and occupational orientation of students majoring in Navigation Technology. Drawing on the IMO MASS Code and the China Classification Society Rules for Intelligent Ships (2026), this study examines five typical stages: automated assistance and decision support, remote control with crew on board, remote control without crew on board, autonomous operation with human-machine collaboration, and full-voyage autonomy with shore-based supervision. On this basis, a core competency development framework is proposed, consisting of stage evolution, job transformation, competency needs, and educational pathways. The study argues that, in addition to conventional seamanship, students should develop competencies in smart navigation equipment, remote control, autonomous navigation system supervision, human-machine collaboration, data analysis, shore-based operations management, and regulatory safety. Accordingly, pathways are proposed for reconstructing training objectives, optimizing the curriculum, reforming practical teaching, developing integrated teaching platforms, and improving competency-oriented assessment. The findings provide a reference for educational reform in Navigation Technology programs under the development of intelligent ships.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

International Maritime Organization. (2026). Autonomous shipping. Retrieved June 1, 2026. https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/Pages/Autonomous-shipping.aspx.

International Maritime Organization. (2026). IMO adopts first global Code for autonomous ships. Retrieved June 1, 2026. https://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/pages/IMO-adopts-MASS-Code.aspx.

International Maritime Organization. (2019). Interim Guidelines for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships Trials: MSC.1/Circ.1604. London: International Maritime Organization.

International Maritime Organization. (2021). Outcome of the Regulatory Scoping Exercise for the Use of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS): MSC.1/Circ.1638. London: International Maritime Organization.

International Maritime Organization. (2026). International Code of Safety for Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS Code). London: International Maritime Organization.

International Maritime Organization. (2026). Convention on the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (COLREGs), 2026 edition. London: International Maritime Organization.

International Maritime Organization. (1978). International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978, as amended. London: International Maritime Organization.

China Classification Society. (2026). Rules for Intelligent Ships 2026. Beijing: China Classification Society.

DNV. (2026). IMO MSC 111: New MASS Code adopted. Retrieved June 1, 2026. https://www.dnv.com/news/2026/imo-mcs-111-new-mass-code-adopted/.

Maritime and Coastguard Agency. (2025). MCA Remote Operator Training and Certification: Introduction to the Remote Operator Pilot Framework. London: Maritime and Coastguard Agency.

Maritime UK. (2024). Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships: UK Industry Conduct Principles and Code of Practice, Version 8. London: Maritime UK.

Burmeister, H. C., Bruhn, W. C., Rødseth, Ø. J., & Porathe, T. (2014). Autonomous unmanned merchant vessel and its contribution towards the e-navigation implementation: The MUNIN perspective. International Journal of e-Navigation and Maritime Economy, 1, 1-13.

Rolls-Royce. (2016). Remote and Autonomous Ships: The Next Steps. London: Rolls-Royce plc.

Ahvenjärvi, S. (2016). The human element and autonomous ships. TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 10(3), 517-521.

Man, Y., Lundh, M., Porathe, T., & MacKinnon, S. (2015). From desk to field: Human factor issues in remote monitoring and controlling of autonomous unmanned vessels. Procedia Manufacturing, 3, 2674-2681.

Porathe, T., Prison, J., & Man, Y. (2014). Situation awareness in remote control centres for unmanned ships. Human Factors in Ship Design & Operation. London: Royal Institution of Naval Architects.

Bachari-Lafteh, M., & Harati-Mokhtari, A. (2021). Operator's skills and knowledge requirement in autonomous ships control centre. Journal of International Maritime Safety, Environmental Affairs, and Shipping, 5(2), 74-83.

Emad, G. R., & Ghosh, S. (2023). Identifying essential skills and competencies towards building a training framework for future operators of autonomous ships: A qualitative study. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs.

Kim, J. (2024). A fundamental study of the sustainable key competencies for remote operators of maritime autonomous surface ships. Sustainability, 16(12), 4875.

Belabyad, M., Kontovas, C., Pyne, R., Shi, W., Li, N., Szwed, P., & Chang, C. H. (2025). The human element in autonomous shipping: A study on skills and competency requirements. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs.

Belabyad, M., Kontovas, C., Pyne, R., Shi, W., Li, N., Szwed, P., & Chang, C. H. (2025). Skills and competencies for operating maritime autonomous surface ships (MASS): A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Maritime Policy & Management.

Meštrović, T., Pavić, I., et al. (2024). Challenges for the education and training of seafarers in the context of autonomous ships. Applied Sciences, 14(8), 3173.

Kim, T. E., Perera, L. P., Sollid, M. P., Batalden, B. M., & Sydnes, A. K. (2022). Safety challenges related to autonomous ships in mixed navigational environments. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 21, 141-159.

Kuntasa, T., & Lirn, T. C. (2024). A conceptual model of autonomous ship remote operators' competency. The Journal of Navigation, 76(6), 653-674.

Campos Toresano, C., Castells-Sanabra, M., Mujal-Colilles, A., De Hert, G., Gundic, A., Valcic, S., Hovden, V., & Boren, C. (2025). Adapting maritime education for the autonomous era: A pilot program as approach for MASS operator training. TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 19(3), 823-830.

Belev, B., Penev, A., Mohović, Đ., & Perić Hadžić, A. (2021). Autonomous ships in maritime education model course 7.01. Pomorstvo, 35(2), 388-394.

Kondo, T., & Fujimoto, T. (2025). A study on the implications of maritime autonomous surface ships on maritime education and training. TransNav: International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 19(4).

Tu, E., Zhang, G., Rachmawati, L., Rajabally, E., & Huang, G. B. (2018). Exploiting AIS data for intelligent maritime navigation: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19(5), 1559-1582.

Ramos, M. A., Utne, I. B., & Mosleh, A. (2019). Collision avoidance on maritime autonomous surface ships: Operators' tasks and human failure events. Safety Science, 116, 33-44.