Evolutionary Characteristics and Governance Pathways of Exam Cheating Behavior among Undergraduate Students

Linhui Li; Nila Lan; Hua Yang

doi:10.62177/jetp.v3i1.1156

Authors

Linhui Li Academic Affairs Office, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology
Nila Lan Academic Affairs Office, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology
Hua Yang Academic Affairs Office, Guilin University of Aerospace Technology

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62177/jetp.v3i1.1156

Keywords:

Undergraduate Universities, Exam Cheating, Examination Management, Causal Analysis

Abstract

This study analyzes 368 cases of undergraduate exam cheating investigated at H University from 2021 to 2025. Using descriptive statistical analysis, the research systematically examines the evolving characteristics of cheating behaviors. The findings indicate a significant rebound in cheating incidents after a temporary decline in the 2022 academic year. In terms of grade distribution, sophomores and juniors represent the highest-risk groups. From a disciplinary perspective, cheating is predominantly concentrated in professional courses, with a significantly higher proportion than in public basic courses. Regarding methods, traditional paper-based materials (cheat sheets) still dominate (approximately 60%), but cheating using electronic devices and proxy exam-taking now account for nearly 30% of cases. Based on these findings, this paper proposes targeted governance strategies focusing on the reform of core professional course assessments, academic pressure counseling for upper-year students, and the implementation of a differentiated proctoring system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2018). Opinions on accelerating the construction of high-level undergraduate education and comprehensively improving talent training capacity.

Sozon, M., Sia, B. C., Pok, W. F., et al. (2024). Academic integrity violations in higher education: A systematic literature review from 2013–2023. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education.

Harper, R., & Prentice, F. (2024). Responsible but powerless: Staff qualitative perspectives on cheating in higher education. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 20(1), 25.

Eaton, S. E., Pethrick, H., & Turner, K. L. (2023). Academic integrity and student mental well-being: A rapid review. Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity, 5(2), 34-58.

Janinovic, J., Pekovic, S., Djokovic, R., et al. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of academic integrity institutional policies: How can honor code and severe punishments deter students’ cheating—Moderating approach? Sage Open, 14(4), 21582440241307430.

Evangelista, E. D. L. (2025). Ensuring academic integrity in the age of ChatGPT: Rethinking exam design, assessment strategies, and ethical AI policies in higher education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 17(1), ep559.

Furze, L., Perkins, M., Roe, J., et al. (2024). The AI Assessment Scale (AIAS) in action: A pilot implementation of GenAI-supported assessment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 38-55.