From Ritual to Spectacle: Nomadic Wedding Dances and the Politics of Cultural Transformation in China

Authors

  • Manfang Lyu Tianjin College of Media and Arts
  • Hongjia Guo Tianjin Art Vocational College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62177/chst.v2i2.382

Keywords:

Intangible Heritage, Ethnic Performance, Semiotic Labor, Ritual Aestheticization, Cultural Politics in China

Abstract

This article offers a critical analysis of Mongolian and Kazakh wedding dances in contemporary China, treating these ritual performances not as vestiges of folk culture but as choreographed sites of semiotic labor, identity negotiation, and cultural regulation. Drawing on ethnographic case studies, movement analysis, and critical cultural theory, the study traces how kinship-centered ceremonies have been transformed into performative spectacles under the pressures of state-led heritage discourse, tourism economies, and visual nationalism.
Through a comparative reading of Ordos and Kazakh choreographies, the paper reveals how ritual sequences encode distinct logics of gender, kinship, and authority, while being repackaged for external legibility. Rather than expressing cultural continuity, these dances increasingly serve as instruments of aesthetic governance—legible, marketable, and politically managed. Concepts such as the aesthetic contract of recognition, ritual opacity, and choreographic authorship are mobilized to interrogate the shifting boundaries between embodied belief and curated display.
Engaging frameworks by Hall, Habermas, and de Certeau, the study shows that the modernization of wedding dance renders it both more visible and more vulnerable—visible to the nation, but estranged from community meaning. The article contributes to ongoing debates in performance studies, heritage politics, and affect theory by advocating for a more reflexive, community-centered approach to intangible cultural heritage—one that honors not only what can be shown, but what must be lived, misremembered, and remade.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Turner, V., Abrahams, R., & Harris, A. (2017). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Routledge.

Hall, S., Evans, J., & Nixon, S. (2024). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices. SAGE Publications.

Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. Routledge.

Cai, L. (2021). A study on the commonality between Kazakh and Mongolian dances under the grassland cultural background. Art Evaluation, (5), 11–13.

Ahmed, S. (2004). Affective economies. Social Text, 22(2), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1215/01642472-22-2_79-117

Lepecki, A., & Mayer, T. S. (2013). 9 variações sobre coisas e performance. Urdimento: Revista de Estudos em Artes Cênicas, 2(19), 93–99.

Butler, J. (2011). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. Routledge.

Ahmed, S. (2013). The cultural politics of emotion. Routledge.

Scott, J. C. (1990). Domination and the arts of resistance: Hidden transcripts. Yale University Press.

Hall, S. (2011). Introduction: Who needs ‘identity’? In S. Hall & P. du Gay (Eds.), Questions of cultural identity (pp. 1–17). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Bhabha, H. K. (2012). The location of culture. Routledge.

Shilling, C. (2012). The body and social theory (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Brennan, T. (2004). The transmission of affect. Cornell University Press.

Liu, X. (2022). An introduction to dance anthropology [in Chinese]. Shanghai Music Publishing House.

Fischer-Lichte, E., & Jain, S. (2008). The transformative power of performance: A new aesthetics. Routledge.

Wong, D. (2004). Speak it louder: Asian Americans making music. Routledge.

Taylor, D. (2025). From the archive and the repertoire. In H. Bial (Ed.), The performance studies reader (pp. 33–42). Routledge.

Kirshenblatt-Gimblett, B. (2014). Intangible heritage as metacultural production. Museum International, 66(1–4), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/muse.12031

Mumford, L. (2016). The culture of cities (Vol. 19). Open Road Media.

Berlant, L. (2006). Cruel optimism. differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 17(3), 20–36. https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2006-009

Rendall, S. F. (1984). The practice of everyday life (by M. de Certeau, Trans.). University of California Press.

Ngai, S. (2004). Ugly feelings. Harvard University Press.

De Certeau, M. (1985). Practices of space. In E. Staiger, C. A. Mangham, & R. A. Solway (Eds.), On signs (pp. 122–145). Johns Hopkins University Press

Downloads

How to Cite

Lyu, M., & Guo, H. (2025). From Ritual to Spectacle: Nomadic Wedding Dances and the Politics of Cultural Transformation in China. Critical Humanistic Social Theory, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.62177/chst.v2i2.382

Issue

Section

Articles

DATE

Received: 2025-05-26
Accepted: 2025-05-30
Published: 2025-06-09