A Reflective Study on the Value of Multi-Dimensional Electronic Word-of-Mouth Online Reviews in Social E-Commerce——A Case Study of Pinduoduo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62177/chst.v3i3.1692Keywords:
Social E-commerce, Pinduoduo, Multi-dimensional Online Reviews, Electronic Word-of-Mouth, Consumption CultureAbstract
Continuous innovation in digital consumption models has restructured the operational paradigms of contemporary social commerce, bringing fundamental changes to online information diffusion and consumer decision-making patterns. Unlike traditional e-commerce that relies on static commodity displays and merchant-led promotion, social commerce leverages interpersonal social relationships to achieve content dissemination and user conversion, making user-generated electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) a core, credible reference for shoppers to judge product quality and evade transaction risks in virtual shopping scenarios[12]. As a representative social commerce platform thriving in China’s low-tier sinking markets, Pinduoduo has developed a distinctive multi-dimensional review system distinguished from the single scoring mechanism of conventional e-commerce platforms. Its evaluation ecosystem covers five indispensable dimensions: users’ subjective emotional attitudes, detailed textual experiential descriptions, intuitive audiovisual evidence, delayed long-term supplementary comments, and interactive social feedback behaviors[4][5][8]. Based on three classic academic theories, namely Information Diagnosticity Theory, Social Proof Theory, and Hofstede’s cross-cultural dimension theory[9][10][11], this paper adopts a targeted conceptual analysis approach centered on Pinduoduo’s unique market positioning and operational characteristics. The research systematically explores the diverse practical values embodied by multi-dimensional user reviews, including bridging information gaps in virtual transactions, matching the psychological traits of local consumers, building interactive consumption communication channels, and supporting the sustainable development of the social commerce industry. This study also comprehensively sorts out the realistic bottlenecks constraining the healthy operation of the platform’s current eWOM ecology. The analytical results verify that multi-dimensional review mechanisms go far beyond basic product scoring functions. On one hand, such authentic user-generated content effectively mitigates the information asymmetry dilemma prevalent in online shopping scenarios[2]; on the other hand, it builds an open interactive carrier for consumers to share real shopping experiences and genuine product perceptions[1]. Rooted in China’s typical collectivist cultural context and local consumers’ strong awareness of uncertainty avoidance[10], domestic online shoppers are accustomed to referring to comprehensive, publicly recognized multi-dimensional review information to support their purchase decisions[9]. Nevertheless, excessive commercial profit-seeking and platform algorithm traffic bias have induced prevalent false reviews and eWOM distortion phenomena, severely undermining the practical reference value of user evaluations[8]. On this basis, this paper summarizes the core theoretical contributions and industrial practical significance of the research, clarifies the inherent limitations of pure speculative analysis, and proposes targeted directions for subsequent in-depth research. The research outcomes aim to provide practical theoretical references for optimizing social commerce eWOM ecological construction and promoting the standardized and high-quality development of the industry.
Downloads
References
Guo, G. Q., & Yang, X. C. (2006). Word-of-mouth marketing strategies in the internet era. Finance & Trade Economics, (09): 56-59.
Qi, Y. Z., & Zhang, M. X. (2015). Development logic and research context of social e-commerce. Economic Management, (06): 170-179.
CNNIC. (2025). The 56th statistical report on internet development in China. Beijing: China Internet Network Information Center.
Yan, J. Y., Zhang, L., & Zhang, L. (2012). An empirical study on the influence of online review content on review helpfulness. Information Science, 30(5): 713-716.
Shi, W. H., Gong, X., & Zhang, Q. (2016). A comparative study of initial online reviews and additional online reviews. Management Science, 29(04): 45-58.
Yuan, H. X., Liu, W., & Wang, X. (2018). The impact of compound reviews on product sales: From the perspective of initial reviews and supplementary reviews. Systems Engineering Theory & Practice, 38(10): 2590-2600.
Li, X., & Chen, Y. W. (2016). The influence of supplementary word-of-mouth forms on purchase intention: The moderating effect of word-of-mouth valence. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48(6): 722-732.
Zhang, C. C., Zhou, W. H., & Li, H. (2021). Research on the influence of online review characteristics on consumers’ purchase intention. Consumer Economics, 37(4): 56-63.
Cialdini, R. B. (2009).Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. Revised ed. New York: HarperCollins.
Hofstede, G. (2001).Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Mudambi, S. M., & Schuff, D. (2010). What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Quarterly, 34(1): 185-200.
Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., et al. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(1): 38-52.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Xiaohui Liu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
DATE
Accepted: 2026-09-07
Published: 2026-09-22








