The Impact of Subjective Well-Being on the Fertility Intentions of Women of Childbearing Age

Authors

  • Rong Li Xi’an Polytechnic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62177/chst.v2i1.159

Keywords:

Subjective Well-Being, Fertility Intentions, Income Level

Abstract

In recent years, China has faced the severe challenge of low fertility rates and negative population growth, which poses threats to social stability, economic growth, and the pension system. The government places high importance on this issue, as population resources are key to the sustainable development of society. This study focuses on the group of women of childbearing age in China, using data from the 2021 China General Social Survey (CGSS)to explore the impact of subjective well-being on fertility intentions and its underlying mechanisms. The findings indicate that the higher the subjective well-being of women of childbearing age, the more children they intend to have. This relationship varies among women with different income levels. Income level amplifies the relationship between subjective well-being and fertility intentions. Moreover, the three sub-dimensions of subjective well-being—development experience, satisfaction experience, and physical and mental health experience—all have significant positive impacts on the desired number of children. Heterogeneity analysis further reveals that the impact of subjective well-being on the fertility intentions of women of different ages and marital statuses is markedly different. Based on these findings, developing targeted strategies to enhance the fertility intentions of women of childbearing age can not only help alleviate the urgency of declining fertility rates but also provide practical references for policymakers to promote sustainable economic and social development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

C. W. Investigating the affective part of subjective well-being (SWB)by means of sentiment analysis[J]. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2021,24(6):697-712.

Q. T L. Individual Subjective Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic[J]. Sustainability, 2021,13(14):7816-7816.

Santos L A, Natividade C J, Carneiro F T. Do Romantic Relationships Promote Happiness? Relationships’ Characteristics as Predictors of Subjective Well-Being[J].Inter persona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 2021,15(1):3-19.

Song J, Kuang Y. An Analysis on Female Education Level, Income and Fertility Rate in China[J]. E 3S Web of Conferences2021,25101088-.

Nakagaki Y. Fertility, female labor participation and income in East Asia[J]. International Journal of Development Issues,2018,17(1):69-86.

Fanti L, Gori L. Fertility, income and welfare in an OLG model with regulated wages[J]. International Review of Economics,2007,54(4):405-427.

Leibenstein, H. (1950). Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand. Economics. 1 May 1950.

Leibenstein, H. (1975). The Economic Theory of Fertility Decline. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 89, 1-31.

Brinton C M, OhE. Babies, Work, or Both? Highly Educated Women’s Employment and Fertility in East Asia: 1[J].American Journal of Sociology, 2019,125(1):105-140.

Jennifer Y, R. S O B. Women’s Work Characteristics and Fertility Expectations[J]. Population Research and Policy Review, 2024,43(2):

McDonald P D. Sustaining Fertility through Public Policy:The Range of Options[J]. Population, (2002), 57(3):417-446.

Petts Richard J, Mize Trenton D, and Kaufman Gayle. Organizational policies, workplace culture, and perceived job commitment of mothers and fathers who take parental leave[J]. Social Science Research,2022,103102651-102651.

Chen S, Zhang Y, Wang Y. Individual differences in relative fertility costs and fertility benefits and their effects on fertility desire for a second child in China: a latent profile analysis[J]. Reproductive Health,2019,16(1):1-9.

Michael G, Megan C, Trumble B, et al. Health costs of reproduction are minimal despite high fertility, mortality and subsistence lifestyle. [J].Scientific reports,2016,6(1):30056.

P G M, I G M, J W B. The effect of physical activity on reproductive health outcomes in young women: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Human reproduction update,2019,25(5):541-563.

Liying Y, Har L W, Yuen A L. The effects of psychosocial interventions on the mental health, pregnancy rates, and marital function of infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review. [J]. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2016,33(6):689-701.

Behrman J, Gonalons-Pons P. Women's employment and fertility in a global perspective (1960-2015). Demogr Res. 2020 Jul-Dec; 43:707-744.

Ming W, Weidong W, Neng W, et al. Family Income and Student Educational and Cognitive Outcomes in China: Exploring the Material and Psychosocial Mechanisms[J]. Social Sciences,2020,9(12):225-225.

Howell Ryan T, and Howell Colleen J. The relation of economic status to subjective well-being in developing countries: a meta-analysis. [J].Psychological bulletin, 2008,134(4):536-60.

Yan L. Motherhood Dilemma and Gendered Well-being among Chinese Couples[J]. Applied Research in Quality of Life,2023,18(6):3169-3198.

Perelli-Harris, B. The influence of informal work and subjective well-being on childbearing in post-Soviet Russia[J]. Population and Development Review,2006,32(4):729-753.

Parr N. Satisfaction with Life as an Antecedent of Fertility: Partner +Happiness =Children[J]. Demographic Research,2010,22(1):635-662.

Philip D, Harry K. The effect of education on overall fertility[J]. Journal of Population Economics,2022,36(1):471-503.

Khullar M, Sudarshan M R. Work and Family: Conversations About Identity with Middle-class Women[J]. Indian Journal of Gender Studies,2024,31(3):372-393.

Sari P W .Work Family Conflict, Recovery Experience, & Employee’s Weel Being in Working Women (Case Study of Nurses in Inpatient Division at Hospital in Bandung)[J].HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, 2020,11(1):124-138.

Yu S, Blader L S. Why Does Social Class Affect Subjective Well-Being? The Role of Status and Power[J].Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2020,46(3):331-348.

Webster D, Dunne L, Hunter R. Association Between Social Networks and Subjective Well-Being in Adolescents: A Systematic Review[J]. Youth & Society, 2020,53(2):0044118x2091958.

Ze X, Xinyue Z, Yi qi L, et al. Fertility intention and its affecting factors in China: A national cross-sectional survey[J]. Heliyon,2023,9(2): e13445-e13445.

Zhao J, Zou Z, Chen J, et al. Offline social capital, online social capital, and fertility intentions: evidence from China[J]. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,2024,11(1):1131-1131.

Baliamoune–Lutz M ,McGillivray M .The impact of gender inequality in education on income in Africa and the Middle East[J].Economic Modelling, 2015,471-11.

Downloads

How to Cite

Li, R. (2025). The Impact of Subjective Well-Being on the Fertility Intentions of Women of Childbearing Age. Critical Humanistic Social Theory, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.62177/chst.v2i1.159

Issue

Section

Articles