Empowerment or Stratification? The Dual Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence on the Competency Structure and Future Development of Design
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62177/chst.v3i2.1286Keywords:
Generative AI, Design Students, Competency Structure, Future Development, Educational Stratification, Design EducationAbstract
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is rapidly permeating design education, creative practice, and professional preparation, continuously reshaping the competency structure and developmental trajectories of design students. From the dual perspectives of technological empowerment and educational stratification, this study examines how GenAI reconstructs students’ competencies, expands their professional imagination, and simultaneously intensifies developmental disparities.
The findings suggest that, on the one hand, GenAI enhances students’ capabilities in creative ideation, information integration, cross-media expression, and human–AI collaboration. On the other hand, disparities in technology access, digital literacy, aesthetic judgment, and educational resources contribute to increasing differentiation within the student population.
In response, this paper argues that design education should systematically incorporate AI literacy, critical thinking, aesthetic judgment, and originality into its curriculum, so as to address the evolving demands of talent cultivation in the age of artificial intelligence.
Downloads
References
Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. Paris: UNESCO.
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., et al. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, 15.
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., et al. (2023). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642.
Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278.
Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhu, Z., Zhang, Y., Wang, J., & Li, Y. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 252, 124167.
Fleischmann, K. (2024). Generative artificial intelligence in graphic design education: A student perspective. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 50(1), 1-17.
Huh, M. B., Miri, M., & Tracy, T. (2025). Students’ perceptions of generative AI image tools in design education: Insights from architectural education. Education Sciences, 15(9), 1160.
Alsswey, A. (2025). Examining students' perspectives on the use of artificial intelligence tools in higher education: A case study on AI tools of graphic design. Acta Psychologica, 258, 105190.
Karadağ, D., & Ozar, B. (2025). A new frontier in design studio: AI and human collaboration in conceptual design. Frontiers of Architectural Research, 14(6), 1536-1550.
Abrusci, L., Dabaghi, K., D’Urso, S., & Sciarrone, F. (2025). AI4Design: A generative AI-based system to improve creativity in design—A field evaluation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100401.
Habib, S., Vogel, T., Anli, X., & Thorne, E. (2024). How does generative artificial intelligence impact student creativity? Journal of Creativity, 34(1), 100072.
Daher, W., & Hussein, A. (2024). Higher education students’ perceptions of GenAI tools for learning. Information, 15(7), 416.
Lythreatis, S., Singh, S. K., & El-Kassar, A. N. (2022). The digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121359.
Van de Werfhorst, H. G., Kessenich, E., & Geven, S. (2022). The digital divide in online education: Inequality in digital readiness of students and schools. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100100.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Naixin Hou, Bo Gao

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
DATE
Accepted: 2026-05-26
Published: 2026-05-28








