The Relationship Between Conspicuous Signals and Players’ Friendly Experience in the MOBA Mobile Game Honor of Kings: The Mediating Roles of Perceived Economic Status and Perceived Competence Status, and the Moderating Role of Cognitive Level

Authors

  • Weixiang Gan Zhenguigu Technology Co., Ltd.
  • Mengfei Xiao SEGi University
  • Naiqian Zhang Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences
  • Qiuying Yue SEGi University
  • Sikun Chen SEGi University
  • Tara Ahmed Mohammed SEGi University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62177/chst.v3i1.1179

Keywords:

Honor of Kings, MOBA Games, Conspicuous Signals, Friendly Experience, Social Status Perception, Cognitive Level

Abstract

Using the MOBA mobile game Honor of Kings as the research context, this study examines the formation mechanism of players’ friendly experience by investigating how two types of conspicuous signals, namely virtual assets and game skill, shape players’ interactive experience during matches. It further explores the roles played by perceived economic status, perceived competence status, and cognitive level in this process. The findings show that players’ friendly experience in game interactions is determined less by whether they are rational or mature, and more by conspicuous signals and the status judgments triggered by such signals. Compared with virtual assets, game skill is more effective in consistently eliciting teammates’ respect, trust, and cooperation. Although virtual assets can also improve the quality of interaction, they primarily evoke associations with economic standing rather than recognition of competence. The results also indicate that players clearly distinguish between high spending and high ability. Possessing rare skins or premium status markers does not necessarily lead others to assume that the player is a stronger teammate. At the same time, cognitive level does not significantly alter the overall mechanism. However, players with a higher cognitive level are less likely to form status judgments about others solely on the basis of surface cues. This study reveals the deeper logic underlying friendly interaction in MOBA games, showing that such interaction is essentially a process of social evaluation triggered by conspicuous signals and shaped through status categorisation. The study contributes to a deeper understanding of social behaviour in digital games from the perspective of positive interaction, and it also offers theoretical implications for player behaviour optimisation and platform governance design.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Fritsch, J., Weyland, S., Vorgic, S., & Jekauc, D. (2023). The assessment of the halo-effect in a questionnaire rating dimensions of coaches’ competence. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 23, 163–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2023.2291727

Gaubert, C., & Louvet, E. (2021). Wealth, power, status. Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000443

Laham, S., & Forgas, J. (2022). Halo effects. In Cognitive Illusions. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003154730-19

Shtulman, A., & Young, A. G. (2022). The development of cognitive reflection. Child Development Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12476

Vikhman, A. A. (2025). Values and cognitive reflection: Verifying the social heuristics hypothesis. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Filosofia. Psikhologia. Sotsiologia. https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2025-2-216-228

Westra, E. (2023). Symbolic belief in social cognition. Philosophical Perspectives. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12196

Gong, M., Wagner, C., & Ali, A. (2023). The impact of social network embeddedness on mobile massively multiplayer online games play. Information Systems Journal, 34(2), 327–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12479

Huo, S., Wan Abas, W. A. b., & Waheed, M. (2023). Gamers' reasons for purchasing gaming virtual products: A systematic review. Studies in Media and Communication. https://doi.org/10.11114/smc.v12i1.6532

Koles, B., Nagy, P., & Vollet, G. (2025). How players make use of cosmetic items in video games: A persona approach. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2490

Lee, J., Kim, S., Park, Y. S., Kim, J., Jang, J.-W., & Seering, J. (2025). Less talk, more trust: Understanding players' in-game assessment of communication processes in League of Legends. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3714226

Xia, T., Lin, X., Mo, X., Su, Q., & Ding, S. (2024). Players’ continuous willingness to play in MOBA game ranking mode: Through the lens of self-determination theory and social comparison theory. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1398. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03934-1

Yang, B. (2024). Research on user experience to market profitability: A multidimensional analysis of the success of Honor of Kings. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2024.18723

Zhang, S., Li, Z., & Chen, X. (2025). Cultural identity and virtual consumption in the mimetic homeland: A case study of Chinese Generation Z mobile game players. Social Sciences, 14(6), 362. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14060362

Aguerri, J.-C., Santisteban, M., & Miró-Llinares, F. (2023). The enemy hates best? Toxicity in League of Legends and its content moderation implications. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 29, 437–456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-023-09541-1

Gong, M., Wagner, C., & Ali, A. (2023). The impact of social network embeddedness on mobile massively multiplayer online games play. Information Systems Journal, 34(2), 327–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12479

Koles, B., Nagy, P., & Vollet, G. (2025). How players make use of cosmetic items in video games: A persona approach. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2490

Kordyaka, B., Laato, S., Jahn, K., Hamari, J., & Niehaves, B. (2023). The cycle of toxicity: Exploring relationships between personality and player roles in toxic behavior in multiplayer online battle arena games. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7(CHI PLAY), 611–641. https://doi.org/10.1145/3611043

Lee, J., Kim, S., Park, Y. S., Kim, J., Jang, J.-W., & Seering, J. (2025). Less talk, more trust: Understanding players’ in-game assessment of communication processes in League of Legends. Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3706598.3714226

Liu, Y., & Agur, C. (2022). “After all, they don’t know me”: Exploring the psychological mechanisms of toxic behavior in online games. Games and Culture, 18(4), 598–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120221115397

Morrier, J., Mahmassani, A., & Alvarez, R. M. (2025). How do the effects of toxicity in competitive online video games vary by source and match outcome? PLOS ONE, 20(6), e0325462. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0325462

Poeller, S., Dechant, M., Klarkowski, M., & Mandryk, R. L. (2023). Suspecting sarcasm: How League of Legends players dismiss positive communication in toxic environments. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7(CSCW2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3611020

Shou, S. (2023). Psychology behind aggressive language used in Honor of Kings. Communications in Humanities Research, 7, Article 20230883. https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/7/20230883

Wijkstra, M., Rogers, K., Mandryk, R. L., Veltkamp, R. C., & Frommel, J. (2024). How to tame a toxic player? A systematic literature review on intervention systems for toxic behaviors in online video games. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 8(CHI PLAY). https://doi.org/10.1145/3677080

Xia, T., Lin, X., Mo, X., Su, Q., & Ding, S. (2024). Players’ continuous willingness to play in MOBA game ranking mode: Through the lens of self-determination theory and social comparison theory. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1398. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03934-1

Zsila, Á., Shabahang, R., Aruguete, M., & Orosz, G. (2022). Toxic behaviors in online multiplayer games: Prevalence, perception, risk factors of victimization, and psychological consequences. Aggressive Behavior, 48(4), 356–364. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.22023

Feng, J., & Zhang, X. (2022). Analysis of mobile game intellectual property marketing strategy: A case study of Honor of Kings. Applied Economics and Finance, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.11114/aef.v9i4.5707

Gong, M., Wagner, C., & Ali, A. (2023). The impact of social network embeddedness on mobile massively multiplayer online games play. Information Systems Journal, 34(2), 327–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12479

Steinkuehler, C. (2023). Games as social platforms. Games: Research and Practice, 1(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3582930

Xia, T., Lin, X., Mo, X., Su, Q., & Ding, S. (2024). Players’ continuous willingness to play in MOBA game ranking mode: Through the lens of self-determination theory and social comparison theory. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11, 1398. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03934-1

Xiang, J., & Yuan, S. (2025). eSports and gaming: China’s quest for global soft power. East Asia. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-025-09459-x

Zhao, M. (2023). The rise of platform game work in China. The Economic and Labour Relations Review. https://doi.org/10.1017/elr.2023.15

Downloads

How to Cite

Gan, W., Xiao, M., Zhang, N., Yue, Q., Chen, S., & Tara Ahmed Mohammed. (2026). The Relationship Between Conspicuous Signals and Players’ Friendly Experience in the MOBA Mobile Game Honor of Kings: The Mediating Roles of Perceived Economic Status and Perceived Competence Status, and the Moderating Role of Cognitive Level. Critical Humanistic Social Theory, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.62177/chst.v3i1.1179

Issue

Section

Articles

DATE

Received: 2026-03-09
Accepted: 2026-03-12
Published: 2026-03-24