Analysis of the Current Status of Research on Outpatient Physician-Patient Communication in China and Abroad over the Past Two Decades: A Comparison Based on CNKI and WOSCC

Authors

  • Zihan Xiong Nanchang Medical University
  • Qimeng Sun Nanchang Medical University
  • Sha Xie Nanchang Medical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62177/apjcmr.v2i3.1368

Keywords:

Outpatient Care, Doctor–Patient Communication, Bibliometric Analysis, Shared Decision-Making, Narrative Medicine

Abstract

Objective: Outpatient doctor–patient communication directly influences diagnostic efficiency and patient satisfaction. However, domestic research remains limited in scale and often lacks systematic communication models. This study compares domestic and international research hotspots and trends over the past two decades through bibliometric and keyword evolution analysis, with particular attention to the role of narrative medicine. Method Literature published between January 1st, 2005 and December 31st, 2024 was retrieved from China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) and Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC). CiteSpace was employed for bibliometric visualization, and representative studies were reviewed to identify thematic foci and methodological features. Results: Over the past two decades, research on outpatient physician-patient communication has exhibited a progressive trend, evolving from “basic concepts” to “relationships/experiences,” and ultimately to “mechanistic deepening.” Internationally, a transition has been completed—shifting from mere “information transmission” toward a framework encompassing “patient-centered care, shared decision-making, and narrative medicine.” This evolution has resulted in a comprehensive system that integrates theory, practical tools, and education, and has led to the widespread adoption of qualitative and mixed-methods approaches. Although the volume of domestic publications has grown rapidly, research remains predominantly focused on identifying problems and proposing countermeasures, while the exploration of underlying mechanisms and practical application at the grassroots level remains relatively insufficient. Conclusion: Research on physician-patient communication is evolving from a focus on single issues toward multidimensional integration; however, disparities persist—both domestically and internationally—regarding the pace of development, theoretical depth, and methodological approaches. Moving forward, through the synergistic advancement of institutional frameworks, education, and digitalization—and by drawing upon established best practices—we should construct an outpatient communication system that is quantifiable, replicable, and capable of continuous optimization, thereby achieving a balance among efficiency, patient experience, and trust.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China, & National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. (2024). Action plan for enhancing medical humanistic care (2024–2027). Retrieved September 7, 2025, from https://www.nhc.gov.cn/ylyjs/gzdt/202410/3cc5cffc01964fd89ad2879f1ca62281.shtml

Li, M. (2018). Study on outpatient doctor–patient conversation based on communicative intention (Master’s thesis). Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Zhao, T., Zou, X., & Zhou, H. (2019). Investigation on communication skills of general practitioners in outpatient settings in Beijing. Chinese General Practice, 22(4), 413–416.

Wang, Q., & Xia, M. (2024). Ethical dilemmas and countermeasures of informed consent. Jiangsu Health System Management, 35(11), 1559–1562.

Ong, L. M., Dehaes, J. C., Hoos, A. M., & et al. (1995). Doctor-patient communication: A review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine, 40(7), 903–918.

Hong, X. (2018). Shared decision-making between doctors and patients. Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital, 9(3), 277–280.

Zhu, X., Hu, Y., Wu, X., & et al. (2021). Evaluation of patient experience under the background of Internet+ healthcare: A systematic review. Chinese Journal of Health Policy, 14(7), 18–25.

Zhang, L., & He, L. (2021). A review of doctor–patient conversation studies from a linguistic perspective. Medicine and Philosophy, 42(12), 54–58.

Rogers, G., Szomszor, M., & Adams, J. (2020). Sample size in bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 125(2), 777–794.

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., & et al. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285–296.

Liping, G. (2023). An overview of narrative medicine in China. Chinese Medicine and Culture, 6(2), 205–212.

Wang, L., Li, L., Yu, P., & et al. (2023). Current status and influencing factors of narrative competence among 237 nursing postgraduates. Journal of Nursing (China), 30(17), 1–4.

Vavdulmen, S. (2011). The value of tailored communication for patient-centred outcomes. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 17(2), 381–383.

Ruiz-Moral, R., Perula de Torres, L. A., & Jaremillo-Martin, I. (2007). The effect of patients' met expectations on consultation outcomes in general practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(1), 86–91.

Schouten, B. C., & Meeuwesen, L. (2006). Cultural differences in medical communication: A review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling, 64(1–3), 21–34.

Gross, S., Underlich, K., Arpagaus, A., & et al. (2025). Effectiveness of blended learning to improve medical students' communication skills: A randomized, controlled trial. BMC Medical Education, 14(25), 383.

Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT utility in healthcare education, research, and practice: Systematic review on the promising perspectives and valid concerns. Healthcare, 11(6), 887.

Charon, R. (2006). Narrative medicine: Honoring the stories of illness. Oxford University Press.

Tang, Y., Zhuang, L., Li, X., & et al. (2025). Dilemmas and countermeasures of shared decision-making in clinical practice. Medicine and Philosophy, 46(4), 19–23.

Silverman, J., Kurtz, S., & Draper, J. (2013). Skills for communicating with patients (3rd ed.). CRC Press.

Elwyn, G., Frosch, D., Thomson, R., & et al. (2012). Shared decision making: A model for clinical practice. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27(10), 1361–1367.

Wu, J., Liu, F., Hu, H., & et al. (2017). Cognition and attitudes toward doctor–patient disputes among both parties. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 33(6), 938–941.

Shao, J., Liu, H., Zhang, Y., & et al. (2024). Development and application of an AI-based empathy language teaching and evaluation system for doctor–patient communication. Chinese General Practice, 27(34), 4315–4321.

Luo, X., Ding, H., & Han, J. (2022). Online health information communication and promotion of doctor–patient relationships. Medicine and Philosophy, 43(4), 45–49.

Thomas, E. C., Bass, S. B., & Siminoff, L. A. (2021). Beyond rationality: Expanding the practice of shared decision making in modern medicine. Social Science & Medicine, 277, 113900.

Shen, Y. (2024). Study on the construction of harmonious doctor–patient relationships in the new era (Master’s thesis). Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

Downloads

How to Cite

Xiong, Z., Sun, Q., & Xie, S. (2026). Analysis of the Current Status of Research on Outpatient Physician-Patient Communication in China and Abroad over the Past Two Decades: A Comparison Based on CNKI and WOSCC. Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Medical Research, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.62177/apjcmr.v2i3.1368

Issue

Section

Articles

DATE

Received: 2026-05-01
Accepted: 2026-05-06
Published: 2026-05-13