Driving Sustainable Innovation in Asia through Environmental Tax Reform in China’s Energy-Intensive Industries

Wei Zhao; Junkang Zhang; Aldis  Bulis; Hao Chen

doi:10.62177/amit.v1i6.980

Authors

Wei Zhao Turība University
Junkang Zhang Liaoning University
Aldis Bulis Turiba University
Hao Chen University of Twente

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62177/amit.v1i6.980

Keywords:

Environmental Protection Tax Law, Corporate Innovation, R&D Investment, Heavily Polluting Enterprises, Difference-in-Differences

Abstract

This study examines the impact of China's 2018 Environmental Protection Tax Law (EPTL) on technological innovation in energy-intensive industries, addressing gaps in understanding how market-based environmental policies influence R&D reallocation and firm behavior in developing economies. Employing a difference-in-differences (DID) framework augmented with propensity score matching (PSM-DID), we analyze panel data from A-share listed firms over 2012–2023, treating heavily polluting enterprises as the experimental group. Innovation is proxied by the natural log of patent applications plus one, with R&D intensity serving as the mediator, and heterogeneity explored across ownership structure, firm size, and technological sophistication. Results indicate that the EPTL significantly boosted patent applications by 25.5% in treated firms, primarily through enhanced R&D investment. Mediation analysis confirms R&D as the key channel, aligning with the Porter Hypothesis by demonstrating how environmental taxes internalize externalities and spur innovation offsets. Heterogeneity effects reveal stronger impacts in state-owned enterprises (coefficient: 0.317), large firms (0.312), and high-tech entities (0.365) compared to counterparts (0.166, 0.160, 0.192), underscoring resource advantages and institutional factors in amplifying policy efficacy. This research contributes novel micro-level evidence on the dynamic mechanisms of environmental taxation, bridging the "Porter Paradox" by highlighting context-specific innovation responses. Findings inform policy design for balancing environmental stringency with economic growth, advocating flexible tax incentives and R&D supports to foster sustainable industrial transformation in emerging markets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ambec, S., Cohen, M. A., Elgie, S., et al. (2013). The Porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy

Blind, K. (2023). The overall impact of economic, social and institutional regulation on innovation: an update. In Handbook of Innovation and Regulation (pp. 230–262).

Bluffstone, R. A. (2003). Environmental taxes in develop** and transition economies. Public Finance and Management,3(1), 143-175.

Brown, J. R., Martinsson, G., & Thomann, C. (2022). Can environmental policy encourage technical change? Emissions taxes and R&D investment in polluting firms. The Review of financial studies,35(10), 4518-4560.

Chen, D. (2020). The impact of trade barrier reduction on environmental pollution improvement: New evidence from Chinese firm-level pollution data. Journal of Economics, 55(12), 98–114

Da Schio, N., Boussauw, K., & Sansen, J. (2019). Accessibility versus air pollution: A geography of externalities in the Brussels agglomeration. Cities,84, 178-189.

Dahmani, M. (2024). Environmental quality and sustainability: Exploring the role of environmental taxes, environment-related technologies, and R&D expenditure. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies,26(2), 449-477.

Gao, J., Feng, Q., Guan, T., et al. (2023). Unlocking paths for transforming green technological innovation in manufacturing industries. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(3), 100394.

Gunningham, N. (2009). The new collaborative environmental governance: The localization of regulation. Journal of Law and Society,36(1), 145-166.

Guo, X., & Zhang, X. (2023). The effect of environmental regulation on the efficiency of the green economy: the intermediary role of the aggregation of innovative elements. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,20(5), 4575.

Hu, J., Yu, X., & Han, Y. (2023). Can ESG rating promote green transformation of enterprises? Evidence from a multi-period difference-in-differences approach. Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics, 40(07), 90–111.

Hu, S., Wang, A., & Du, K. (2023). Environmental tax reform and greenwashing: evidence from Chinese listed companies. Energy Economics,124, 106873.

Jiang, L., Lu, Y., & Zhang, G. (2021). The impact of free trade zone construction on China’s export behavior. China Industrial Economic Journal (8), 75–93

Jiang, T. (2022). Mediating and moderating effects in causal inference empirical research. China Industrial Economic Journal (5), 100–120.

Kong, L., Li, Z., Liu, B., & Xu, K. (2024). The impact of environmental protection tax reform on low-carbon total factor productivity: Evidence from China's fee-to-tax reform. Energy,290, 130216.

Kumekawa, I. (2024). Measuring the Cost of Pollution: Economic Life, Economic Theory, and the Origins of Environmental Economics. The Journal of Modern History,96(2), 332-361.

La Ferrara，E.，Chong A.，Duryea S. . Soap Operas and Fertility, Evidence from Brazil［J］，American Economic Journal，Applied Economics，2012,4（4），1~31.

Li, C., Firdousi, S. F., & Afzal, A. (2022). China’s Jinshan Yinshan sustainability evolutionary game equilibrium research under government and enterprises resource constraint dilemma. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,29(27), 41012-41036.

Li, C., Teng, Y., Zhou, Y., & Feng, X. (2024). Can environmental protection tax force enterprises to improve green technology innovation? Environmental Science and Pollution Research,31(6), 9371-9391.

Li, M., & Gao, X. (2022). Implementation of enterprises' green technology innovation under market-based environmental regulation: An evolutionary game approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 308, 114570.

Li, W. J., Peng, Y. H., & Tan, Y. C. (2021). Intellectual property protection and corporate innovation: Evidence from China. Journal of Economics, 56(05), 144–161.

Liang, S., Liu, Z., Crawford-Brown, D., & et al. (2014). Decoupling analysis and socioeconomic drivers of environmental pressure in China. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(2), 1103–1113.

Liu, G., Yang, Z., Zhang, F., & Zhang, N. (2022). Environmental tax reform and environmental investment: A quasi-natural experiment based on China's Environmental Protection Tax Law. Energy Economics,109, 106000.

Long, F., Lin, F., & Ge, C. (2022). Impact of China's environmental protection tax on corporate performance: empirical data from heavily polluting industries. Environmental Impact Assessment Review,97, 106892.

Pan, A. L., Liu, X., Qiu, J. L., et al. (2019). Green mergers and acquisitions under media pressure: Can they lead to substantial transformation of heavily polluting firms? China Industrial Economic Journal (02), 174–192.

Rubashkina, Y., Galeotti, M., & Verdolini, E. (2015). Environmental regulation and competitiveness: Empirical evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European manufacturing sectors. Energy Policy, 83, 288–300.

Shao, W., Yang, K., & Chen, Z. (2025). Does the market-oriented environmental regulation promote firms’ technological innovation? Evidence from A-share listed companies in China. Environment, Development and Sustainability,27(1), 1145-1174.

Shen, Y., & Zhang, X. (2022). Study on the impact of environmental tax on industrial green transformation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 16749.

Shi, Q., Xiao, S., & Wu, J. (2020). Stock options and their element design on corporate innovation output: Evidence from risk-taking and performance incentives. Nankai Business Review, 23(2), 27–38, 62

Sun, Y., Lu, Y., Wang, T., Ma, H., & He, G. (2008). Pattern of patent-based environmental technology innovation in China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change,75(7), 1032-1042.

Tang, Y., Yue, S., Ma, W., & Zhang, L. (2022). How do environmental protection expenditure and green technology innovation affect synergistically the financial performance of heavy polluting enterprises? Evidence from China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,29(59), 89597-89613.

Van Rooij, B. (2006). Implementation of Chinese environmental law: regular enforcement and political campaigns. Development and change,37(1), 57-74.

Wang, L., Long, Y., & Li, C. (2022). Research on the impact mechanism of heterogeneous environmental regulation on enterprise green technology innovation. Journal of Environmental Management,322, 116127.

Wang, Y. P., & He, Y. (2021). Environmental regulation, relocation of heavily polluting firms, and the effect of coordinated governance: Empirical evidence from establishing subsidiaries in other regions. Journal of Economic Science (05), 130–145.

Wang, Z., Wang, N., Hu, X., et al. (2022). Threshold effects of environmental regulation types on green investment by heavily polluting enterprises. Environmental Sciences Europe, 34(1), 26.

Wen, Z. L., & Ye, B. J. (2014). Mediating effect analysis: Methods and model development. Advances in Psychological Science, 22(5), 731–745.

Yu, C., & Morotomi, T. (2022). The effect of the revision and implementation for environmental protection law on ambient air quality in China. Journal of Environmental Management,306, 114437.

Zhao, J., Han, M., & Zhang, Y. (2024). A study of the impact of the environmental protection tax on corporate employment: Evidence based on listed companies in polluting industries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,31(40), 53008-53025.

Zhao, M., & Yuan, F. (2022). The top management team and enterprise innovation: An empirical study from growth enterprise market listed companies in China. Managerial and Decision Economics,43(6), 2066-2082.

Zheng, H., & He, Y. (2022). How do the China Pollution Discharge Fee Policy and the Environmental Protection Tax Law affect firm performance during the transitional period? Environmental Science and Pollution Research,29(29), 44541-44557.

Zheng, Q., Wang, X., & Bao, C. (2024). Enterprise R&D, manufacturing innovation and macroeconomic impact: An evaluation of China’s Policy. Journal of Policy Modeling,46(2), 289-303.

Zhou, C., Qi, S., & Li, Y. (2024). Environmental policy uncertainty and green transformation dilemma of Chinese enterprises. Journal of Environmental Management, 370, 122891.