Research on the Digital Divide in Smart Healthcare for the Elderly under Portugal’s “National Digital Strategy - Digital Simplification” Policy

Binghao He

doi:10.62177/amit.v1i5.866

Authors

Binghao He City University of Macau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62177/amit.v1i5.866

Keywords:

Portugal, Elderly Population, Smart Healthcare, Digital Divide

Abstract

The launch of Portugal’s “National Digital Strategy - Digital Simplification” policy signifies the country’s determination for digital development and application, comprehensively covering sectors such as education, healthcare, elderly care, and public administration. The elderly, as the largest group demanding healthcare services, face a significant digital divide problem in the context of smart healthcare development. This paper, based on the definition of core concepts and guided by the theory of digital governance, investigates the digital divide in smart healthcare for the elderly under the Portuguese policy from three dimensions: the access divide, the usage divide, and the outcome divide. The research findings indicate that the elderly in Portugal face issues such as inadequate access to network environments and smart healthcare devices, insufficient willingness to use smart healthcare, and diminished accessibility to smart healthcare services. Based on these findings, and grounded in Portugal’s “National Digital Strategy - Digital Simplification” policy, the study proposes corresponding governance countermeasures from three aspects: improving the top-level design and supporting measures for elderly smart healthcare services; promoting multi-party collaboration to eliminate the elderly’s resistance to smart healthcare; and enhancing the equity and effectiveness of smart healthcare usage among the elderly. This research aims to provide a reference for Portugal to better advance the multi-party collaborative governance of the “digital divide” in elderly healthcare under the “National Digital Strategy - Digital Simplification” context, and to effectively improve the accessibility, equity, and convenience of healthcare for the elderly in the digital age.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Faris S Alghareb & Balqees Talal Hasan. (2025). Leveraging multithreading on edge computing for smart healthcare based on intelligent multimodal classification approach. Computerized medical imaging and graphics. the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society, 124, 594-598.

İbrahim Ahmad Yousef Alkhatib, Mutasem Azmi Alkarablieh, Odai Alabadleh, Malek Suliman Alshnaikat, Mahmoud Abushawali, Monther S. Al atoum… & Bilal A. Salih Ozturk. (2025). The Internet of Things (IoT)‐Based Smart Healthcare System (SHS), Using Blockchain Technique. Internet Technology Letters, 8 (4), 64-71.

Mirou Jaana, Haitham Tamim & Guy Paré. (2025). eHealth and the Digital Divide: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Study of Older Canadians. Journal of medical Internet research, 12(3),172-183.

Elahe Khosravi, Ali Gholizadeh & Saba Saneinia. (2025). Bridging the digital divide: Exploring digitalization’s role in sustainable tourism for BRI countries. Journal of environmental management, 394(6), 127-133.

Anasuya K. Lingappa, Arpit Saini & Asish Oommen Mathew. (2025). The Digital Divide: How Positive Perception Toward Ict And Digital Marketing Outcomes Shape Entrepreneurial Performance. Journal Of Developmental Entrepreneurship, (Prepublish), 8(1).

Apeksha Mewani, Elgloria Harrison & Collette Brown. (2025). Bridging the Digital Divide and Soft Skills: Professional Development for Underrepresented Students at a Minority-Serving Institution. International Journal of Higher Education, 14 (3), 363-369.

Patrick Dunleavy & Helen Margetts. (2025). Data science, artificial intelligence and the third wave of digital era governance. Public Policy and Administration, 40 (2), 185-214.

Marta Ferreira, Joana Seringa & Rui Santana. (2025). Facilitators, barriers, and recommendations for the implementation of a digital-based case management program: the perspective of Portuguese stakeholders. BMC Health Services Research, 25 (1), 844-850.

Sandipan Roy, Raphaël Richert, João Manuel R. S. Tavares & Pierre Lahoud. (2025). Editorial: Applications of digital twin technology in dentistry. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 13, 772-776.

Simon Lewerenz, Anne Moen & Henrique Martins. (2025). Public value and digital health: The example of guiding values in the national digital health strategy of France. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 196, 34-36.

Lénia Carvalhais & Paula Azevedo. (2024). Digital Teacher Training in the Portuguese National Plan for Digital Development at Schools: A Case Study. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29 (3), 1579-1595.

Jiarui Sheng, Yueting Qi & Boyuan Cheng. (2024). Obstacles and Coping Strategies for the Elderly to Use Smart Medical Services. Medical and Health Research, 2 (4), 85-89.

Priharsari Diah, Abedin Babak, Burdon Steve, Clegg Stewart & Clay John. (2023). National digital strategy development: Guidelines and lesson learnt from Asia Pacific countries. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 196, 17-21.

Raja Moonika, Kymre Ingjerd G., Bjerkan Jorunn, Galvin Kathleen T. & Uhrenfeldt Lisbeth. (2023). National digital strategies and innovative eHealth policies concerning older adults’ dignity: a document analysis in three Scandinavian countries. BMC Health Services Research, 23 (1), 848-855.

Zhou Jian, Wang Zeyu, Liu Yang & Yang Jian. (2022). Research on the influence mechanism and governance mechanism of digital divide for the elderly on wisdom healthcare: The role of artificial intelligence and big data. Frontiers in Public Health, 89-94.

Petya Chipeva, Frederico Cruz-Jesus, Tiago Oliveira & Zahir Irani. (2018). Digital divide at individual level: Evidence for Eastern and Western European Countries. Government Information Quarterly, 35 (3), 460-479.