Renewing Introductory Management Courses in Higher Vocational Colleges through Blended Teaching: The Roles of Digital Literacy and Learning Engagement

Authors

  • Baoyin Liu Lincoln University College
  • Rozaini Binti Rosli Lincoln University College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62177/amit.v2i2.1340

Keywords:

Blended Teaching, Introductory Management Courses, Higher Vocational Colleges, Digital Literacy, Learning Engagement, Teaching Reform

Abstract

This paper examines how blended teaching can renew introductory management courses in higher vocational colleges through two closely related pathways: the development of digital literacy and the strengthening of learning engagement. Rather than treating blended teaching as a simple combination of online and face-to-face instruction, the paper understands it as a pedagogical redesign that reorganises preparation, classroom activity, feedback, and assessment. Drawing on scholarship from blended learning, vocational pedagogy, digital literacy, student engagement, and management education, the analysis identifies four persistent constraints in current practice: weak links between theory and workplace situations, uneven student digital readiness, superficial participation, and assessment systems that over-reward short-term recall. The paper argues that digital literacy matters because students in blended environments must search, evaluate, communicate, and complete tasks through digital tools with growing independence. Learning engagement matters because flexible access and platform use produce little educational value unless students participate behaviourally, invest cognitively, and remain emotionally connected to the course. On this basis, the paper proposes six practical pathways for course renewal: reorganising content around managerial tasks, designing a three-stage learning loop, embedding meaningful digital tasks, strengthening engagement through interaction and assessment, developing teachers’ digital-pedagogical capability, and improving institutional support. The study offers a practice-oriented framework for colleges seeking to move foundational management teaching towards more applied, participatory, and digitally informed learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs (pp. 3-21). Pfeiffer.

Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001

Hrastinski, S. (2019). What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends, 63(5), 564-569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5

Arbaugh, J. B. (2014). What might online delivery teach us about blended management education? Prior perspectives and future directions. Journal of Management Education, 38(6), 784-817. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562914534244

Allen, S. J. (2020). On the cutting edge or the chopping block? Fostering a digital mindset and tech literacy in business management education. Journal of Management Education, 44(3), 362-393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562920903077

Billett, S. (2011). Vocational Education: Purposes, Traditions and Prospects. Springer.

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does (4th ed.). Open University Press.

Ng, W. (2012). Can we teach digital natives digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065-1078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.016

Tang, C. M., & Chaw, L. Y. (2016). Digital literacy: A prerequisite for effective learning in a blended learning environment? Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(1), 54-65.

van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 577-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.03.010

UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2018). A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy Skills for Indicator 4.4.2. UNESCO Institute for Statistics.

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758-773. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2011.598505

Henrie, C. R., Halverson, L. R., & Graham, C. R. (2015). Measuring student engagement in technology-mediated learning: A review. Computers & Education, 90, 36-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.09.005

Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8

Ng, D. T. K., Ching, A. C. H., & Law, S. W. (2023). Online learning in management education amid the pandemic: A bibliometric and content analysis. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100796

Porter, W. W., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. A., & Welch, K. R. (2014). Blended learning in higher education: Institutional adoption and implementation. Computers & Education, 75, 185-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.02.011

Rasheed, R. A., Kamsin, A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2020). Challenges in the online component of blended learning: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 144, 103701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103701

Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: The relationship between student characteristics, design features and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14, 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4

Vo, H. M., Zhu, C., & Diep, N. A. (2017). The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education: A meta-analysis. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.01.002

Lopez-Perez, M. V., Perez-Lopez, M. C., & Rodriguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56(3), 818-826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.023

Moghavvemi, S., Sulaiman, A., Jaafar, N. I., & Kasem, N. (2018). Social media as a complementary learning tool for teaching and learning: The case of YouTube. The International Journal of Management Education, 16(1), 37-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2017.12.001

Halverson, L. R., Graham, C. R., Spring, K. J., Drysdale, J. S., & Henrie, C. R. (2014). A thematic analysis of the most highly cited scholarship in the first decade of blended learning research. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 20-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.09.004

Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learner's self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. The Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.004

Hu, Z., Chang, Y. F., & Ho, M. K. (2024). A comparative study on the effectiveness of blended learning, physical learning, and online learning in functional skills training among higher vocational education. STEM Education, 4(3), 247-262.

Downloads

Issue

Section

Articles