Plastic and Concrete Construction Products: A Comparative Review of Material Performance, Cost, Sustainability, and Market Substitution Pathways

Authors

  • Guangtao Zhang Zhejiang Normal University
  • Jiahang Ni Zhejiang Normal University
  • Junlong Zou Zhejiang Normal University
  • Bo Chen Zhejiang Normal University
  • Guangkai Zhang The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62177/jaet.v3i2.1280

Keywords:

Plastic Products, Concrete Products, Construction Materials, Comparative Review, Life-Cycle Cost, Sustainability, Market Substitution

Abstract

This review examines how plastic and concrete construction products compete, coexist, and increasingly hybridize under contemporary pressures of cost control, installation efficiency, service-life performance, and low-carbon transition. Reorganized from a broader bachelor thesis, the paper focuses on product categories in which substitution is already visible or commercially plausible, including drainage pipes, grass block pavers, modular road concepts, and recycled-plastic composite systems. The analysis is structured around five dimensions: intrinsic material characteristics, processing and installation routes, cost structure, application scenario, and sustainability performance. Plastics show clear advantages in low density, corrosion resistance, standardized factory processing, and reduced logistics burden, which supports their expansion in lightweight and modular applications. Concrete retains decisive strengths in compressive capacity, rigidity, fire resistance, and long-term reliability under heavy loading. The review argues that market change does not follow a simple replacement model. Instead, it proceeds through scenario-based substitution, selective coexistence, hybrid integration, and circular upgrading. For construction decision-makers, the central implication is that material choice should be based on service-fit and life-cycle value rather than on nominal material price alone.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

OECD. (2022). Global Plastics Outlook: Economic Drivers, Environmental Impacts and Policy Options. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/de747aef-en

Habert, G., Miller, S. A., John, V. M., Provis, J. L., Favier, A., Horvath, A., & Scrivener, K. L. (2020). Environmental impacts and decarbonization strategies in the cement and concrete industries. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment, 1(11), 559–573. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-020-0093-3

Belaïd, F. (2022). How does concrete and cement industry transformation contribute to mitigating climate change challenges? Resources, Conservation & Recycling Advances, 15, 200084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcradv.2022.200084

Scrivener, K. L., John, V. M., & Gartner, E. M. (2018). Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry. Cement and Concrete Research, 114, 2–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.015

International Energy Agency, & Cement Sustainability Initiative. (2018). Technology Roadmap: Low-Carbon Transition in the Cement Industry. International Energy Agency. https://www.iea.org/reports/technology-roadmap-low-carbon-transition-in-the-cement-industry

Andrady, A. L., & Neal, M. A. (2009). Applications and societal benefits of plastics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1526), 1977–1984. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0304

PlasticsEurope. (2024). Plastics – the Fast Facts 2024. PlasticsEurope. https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/plastics-the-fast-facts-2024/

Siddique, R., Khatib, J., & Kaur, I. (2008). Use of recycled plastic in concrete: A review. Waste Management, 28(10), 1835–1852. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2007.09.011

Vahidi, E., Jin, E., Das, M., Singh, P., & Eckelman, M. J. (2016). Environmental life cycle analysis of pipe materials for sewer systems. Sustainable Cities and Society, 27, 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.06.028

Scholz, M., & Grabowiecki, P. (2007). Review of permeable pavement systems. Building and Environment, 42(11), 3830–3836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.11.016

Appiah, J. K., Berko-Boateng, V. N., & Tagbor, T. A. (2017). Use of waste plastic materials for road construction in Ghana. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 6, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2016.11.001

VolkerWessels. (2019). Sustainability Report 2018. VolkerWessels. https://www.volkerwessels.com/sites/vw_corporate/files/2024-04/VW%20MVO2018%20ENG.pdf

Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances, 3(7), e1700782. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782

Uni-Bell PVC Pipe Association. (2017). Life Cycle Assessment of PVC Water and Sewer Pipe and Comparative Sustainability Analysis of Pipe Materials. Uni-Bell PVC Pipe Association. https://www.uni-bell.org/files/Reports/Life_Cycle_Assessment_of_PVC_Water_and_Sewer_Pipe_and_Comparative_Sustainability_Analysis_of_Pipe_Materials.pdf

Plastics Pipe Institute. (2020). Life Cycle Assessment of North American Stormwater Pipe. Plastics Pipe Institute. https://plasticpipe.org/common/Uploaded%20files/Technical/PPI-TR-53.pdf

TEPPFA. (2024). 100 Years Lifetime of Plastic Pipes: Meta-Study. TEPPFA. https://www.teppfa.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024-04-25-Meta-study-100-years-of-lifetime-of-plastic-pipes.pdf

Kuruppu, U., Rahman, A., & Rahman, M. A. (2019). Permeable pavement as a stormwater best management practice: A review and discussion. Environmental Earth Sciences, 78, 327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8312-2

Muttuvelu, D. V., & Kjems, E. (2021). A systematic review of permeable pavements and their unbound material properties in comparison to traditional subbase materials. Infrastructures, 6(12), 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures6120179

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2021). Permeable Pavements: Stormwater Best Management Practice. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2021-11/bmp-permeable-pavements.pdf

Patil, P., Stankevich, N., Tsydenova, N., & Ilic, Z. D. (2023). Plastic Waste in Road Construction: A Path Worth Paving? Application of Dry Process in South Asia. World Bank. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/099003105242322144/pdf/IDU0743eda4a0091c049000acd506d2f0b9ae123.pdf

Xu, F., Zhao, Y., & Li, K. (2022). Using waste plastics as asphalt modifier: A review. Materials, 15(1), 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15010110

Grady, B. P. (2021). Waste plastics in asphalt concrete: A review. SPE Polymers, 2(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/pls2.10034

Ma, Y., Zhou, H., Jiang, X., Polaczyk, P., Xiao, R., Zhang, M., & Huang, B. (2021). The utilization of waste plastics in asphalt pavements: A review. Cleaner Materials, 2, 100031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clema.2021.100031

Duarte, G. M., & Faxina, A. (2021). Asphalt concrete mixtures modified with polymeric waste by the wet and dry processes: A literature review. Construction and Building Materials, 312, 125408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125408

Santos, J., Pham, A., Stasinopoulos, P., & Giustozzi, F. (2021). Recycling waste plastics in roads: A life-cycle assessment study using primary data. Science of the Total Environment, 751, 141842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141842

Hao, G., He, M., Lim, S. M., Chong, D., Ren, H., & Ng, C. A. (2024). Recycling of plastic waste in porous asphalt pavement: Engineering, environmental, and economic implications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 440, 140865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140865

Saikia, N., & de Brito, J. (2012). Use of plastic waste as aggregate in cement mortar and concrete preparation: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 34, 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.02.066

Park, J., & Kim, M. O. (2020). Mechanical properties of cement-based materials with recycled plastic: A review. Sustainability, 12(21), 9060. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12219060

da Silva, T. R., de Azevedo, A. R. G., Cecchin, D., Marvila, M. T., Amran, M., Fediuk, R., ... Monteiro, S. N. (2021). Application of plastic wastes in construction materials: A review using the concept of life-cycle assessment in the context of recent research for future perspectives. Materials, 14(13), 3549. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14133549

OECD. (2022). Global Plastics Outlook: Policy Scenarios to 2060. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/aa1edf33-en

European Environment Agency. (2024). The Role of Plastics in Europe’s Circular Economy. European Environment Agency. https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/analysis/publications/the-role-of-plastics-in-europes

Hopewell, J., Dvorak, R., & Kosior, E. (2009). Plastics recycling: Challenges and opportunities. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1526), 2115–2126. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0311

Miller, S. A., Horvath, A., & Monteiro, P. J. M. (2018). Impacts of booming concrete production on water resources worldwide. Nature Sustainability, 1(1), 69–76. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-017-0009-5

Watari, T., Cao, Z., Hata, S., & Nansai, K. (2022). Efficient use of cement and concrete to reduce reliance on supply-side technologies for net-zero emissions. Nature Communications, 13, 4158. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31806-2

Downloads

How to Cite

Zhang, G., Ni, J., Zou, J., Chen, B., & Zhang, G. (2026). Plastic and Concrete Construction Products: A Comparative Review of Material Performance, Cost, Sustainability, and Market Substitution Pathways. Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.62177/jaet.v3i2.1280

Issue

Section

Articles

DATE

Received: 2026-04-10
Accepted: 2026-04-13
Published: 2026-04-20