A Study on the Theoretical Evolution, Practical Dilemmas, and Policy Innovations in Enhancing Rural Social Welfare

Yuan Wei

doi:10.62177/apemr.v2i5.823

Authors

Yuan Wei The General Office of the Shaanxi Provincial People’s Government

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62177/apemr.v2i5.823

Keywords:

Social Welfare, Urban–Rural Integration, Rural Revitalization, Socialization of Welfare

Abstract

China’s long-standing social welfare system has exhibited a distinct urban bias, resulting in institutional segmentation between urban and rural welfare frameworks. Consequently, rural residents experience significantly lower levels of social security and public services compared with their urban counterparts. Guided by the macro policy orientation of the Rural Revitalization Strategy, this paper examines the theoretical foundations and explores the policy innovation pathways for improving rural social welfare. Existing research indicates that the current rural welfare system faces three major issues: first, the overall level of welfare provision remains low, with a pronounced urban–rural gap; second, the structure of welfare providers is highly homogeneous, characterized by “remedial” and “relief-oriented” features; and third, the welfare content lacks multi-dimensionality, as economic subsidies continue to dominate the social security system, with insufficient comprehensive social support. Based on the conceptual connotations and functional definitions of social welfare, this study explores the institutional logic and practical feasibility of reform. On this basis, it compares two pathways for improvement—enhancing the degree of rural-to-urban integration (“rural population urbanization”) and strengthening local rural welfare development—by examining their respective advantages and limitations. Finally, the paper proposes targeted policy recommendations for optimizing the rural social welfare system, with the goal of offering theoretical insights and practical guidance for achieving welfare equality between urban and rural areas and advancing the overarching goal of common prosperity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Titmuss, R. M. (1975). Social policy: An introduction.

Spicker, P. (2014). Social policy: Theory and practice. Policy Press.

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press.

Smart, A., & Smart, J. (2001). Local citizenship: welfare reform urban/rural status, and exclusion in China. Environment and Planning A, 33(10), 1853-1869.

Whyte, M. (2010). Myth of the social volcano: Perceptions of inequality and distributive injustice in contemporary China. Stanford University Press.

Pinker, R., & Wong, L. (2005). Marginalization and social welfare in China. Routledge.

Duckett, J. (2012). The Chinese state's retreat from health: Policy and the politics of retrenchment. Routledge.

Gao, Q. (2017). Welfare, work, and poverty: Social assistance in China. Oxford University Press.

Chen, K. Z., Mao, R., & Zhou, Y. (2023). Rurbanomics for common prosperity: new approach to integrated urban-rural development. China Agricultural Economic Review, 15(1), 1-16.

Feng, Z., Robinson, G. M., & Tan, Y. (2025). Rural Revitalization in China: Reversing Rural Decline and Eliminating Poverty. Geography Compass, 19(7), e70039.

Liu, J., Wei, K., & Shuai, Q. (2025). Impact of the new round of Hukou system reforms on rural household development resilience in China. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 17098.

Wang, Z., Liu, C., & Tian, Y. (2025). The Effect of Urban–Rural Public Service Gaps on Consumption Gaps Under the Perspective of Sustainable Development: Evidence from China. Sustainability, 17(13), 6148.

Zhao, X., Yang, S., Li, S., & Gao, Q. (2025). More urban-rural integrated Chinese social welfare: how do the education benefits improve the picture?. Journal of Asian Economics, 101940.

Chen, D., & Fang, X. (2025). Social assistance and non-agriculture employment in rural China: evidence from the Rural Minimum Living Security (Rural Dibao). Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1-11.

Han, Y., & Huang, J. (2019). Evolution of social welfare in rural China: A developmental approach. International Social Work, 62(1), 390-404.

Pan Jinyun, & Li Yanshu. (2009). Modern agricultural service industry: An industrial path to promote agriculture through industry. Economist , 9 , 61-67.

Ma, L., He, Q., Long, H., Zhang, Y., & Liao, L. (2024). Rural return migration in the post COVID-19 China: Incentives and barriers. Journal of Rural Studies, 107, 103258.

Sun, J., Chen, S., & Tian, M. (2024). Retain in the city, return flow, or blind direction: a study on the differentiation mechanism of migrant workers’ migration willingness under the background of China’s strategy for Integrated Urban–Rural Development. Sustainability, 16(19), 8304.

Chen, L., Li, M., & Huang, Y. (2025). From industry to education-driven urbanization: A welfare transformation of urbanization in Chinese counties. Habitat International, 155, 103248.

Xiang, Q., Li, J., & Liu, G. (2024). The impact of rural collective property rights reform on income and poverty reduction: Evidence from China’s rural regions. Plos one, 19(9), e0308393.

Dunford, M. (2022). The Chinese path to common prosperity. International Critical Thought, 12(1), 35-54.

Zhang, Y. (2025). The dual-track paradox in social welfare—a layered governance perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1-14.