The Theoretical Basis and Literature Review of Esg and Enterprise Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62177/apemr.v2i5.804Keywords:
ESG (Environment, Social Responsibility, Corporate Governance), Corporate Performance, New Energy Enterprises, Stakeholder Theory, Signaling Theory, Performance Evaluation System, Literature ReviewAbstract
This paper focuses on the relationship between ESG (Environment, Social Responsibility, and Corporate Governance) and corporate performance, with a specific emphasis on new energy enterprises. It first defines core concepts—clarifying ESG as an investment and operational philosophy guiding enterprises to balance financial and non-financial goals, and corporate performance as a measure of operational quality covering both financial and non-financial dimensions—then elaborates on two key theoretical foundations: Stakeholder Theory, which views enterprises as contractual networks of multiple stakeholders and argues fulfilling ESG responsibilities is key to balancing stakeholder demands and securing long-term resources, and Signaling Theory, which explains ESG practices reduce information asymmetry as credible signals to help enterprises gain trust, acquire resources, and boost performance. The literature review analyzes three areas: corporate performance evaluation methods (DuPont Analysis, BSC, EVA) with their advantages and limitations, new energy enterprise performance evaluation (noting positive impacts of R&D investment and government subsidies but over-reliance on traditional financial indicators), and ESG (tracing its origin, pointing out the lack of a unified global definition, and comparing international evaluation systems like MSCI and FTSE Russell with China’s fledgling localized systems that draw on international experience). Overall, the paper lays a theoretical and empirical groundwork for exploring the ESG-performance relationship (especially for China’s new energy enterprises) and identifies research gaps, such as the need for localized ESG systems and improved new energy enterprise performance evaluation frameworks.
Downloads
References
Fan, J. J., & Guo, H. (2021). A study on corporate financial performance evaluation methods. *Manager*, (01), 94-95.
Gao, T. Q., & Zhao, Q. Y. (2023). Research on the limitations and improvement of DuPont Analysis. *Management and Technology of SME*, (04), 164-166.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. *Harvard Business Review*, 70(1), 71-79.
Wu, C. X. (2021). Application of the balanced scorecard in corporate performance appraisal. *Money China*, (02), 189-190.
Yao, C. (2020). A study on the application of the balanced scorecard in corporate performance management. *China Management Informationization*, 23(01), 117-118.
Paranjape, B., Stojanovic, J., & Dave, B. (2019). Balanced Scorecard: A review and future directions. *International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management*, 68(6), 1243-1264.
Dong, H., & Wang, X. L. (2019). Analysis of performance management issues based on the balanced scorecard. *Modern Marketing (Business Edition)*, (02), 137.
Hou, H. (2021). Research on a comprehensive performance evaluation system combining EVA and the balanced scorecard. *Marketing Industry*, (09), 88-89.
Zhou, H. L., Chen, M. Y., & Cao, M. H. (2021). Research on performance management based on the balanced scorecard. *China Circulation Economy*, (30), 76-78.
Hui, E. C. M., Gao, Y. O., & Chan, K. K. K. (2015). Does EVA truly reflect the performance of property companies in China? *International Journal of Strategic Property Management*, 19(3), 260-270.
Xu, G. H., & Gu, T. Y. (2019). A study on EVA performance evaluation of "China State Shipbuilding Corporation Heavy Industry". *Communication of Finance and Accounting*, (26), 53-55.
Jiang, S. F. (2020). A brief discussion on the role of Economic Value Added (EVA) in corporate performance management. *China Business & Trade*, (22), 146-147.
Li, H. J., Sun, Y., & Ren, L. (2017). Research on green technology innovation performance of listed new energy companies. *Science and Technology Management Research*, 37(21), 240-246.
Xiu, M. M., & Dai, Y. C. (2020). Government subsidies, R&D investment and corporate economic performance: A case study of listed new energy companies. *Journal of Qingdao University (Natural Science Edition)*, 33(03), 102-109.
Li, X. M., Zhang, C., & Li, D. K. (2024). The impact of the digital economy on technological innovation in the new energy vehicle industry. *Journal of Xinyang Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)*, 44(01), 44-50.
Yong, H., He, Y., Li, Y., & An, P. Y. (2019). Research on market competition strategies of power supply enterprises under the background of new power system reform. *Hubei Electric Power*, 43(02), 36-41+49.
Peng, X., Guo, Y. R., Wang, C. Z., Wen, Y., & Chen, K. (2019). The impact path of market orientation on the performance of forest biomass energy enterprises. *Forestry Economy*, 41(11), 10-17+33.
Sharma, V., & Kumar, A. (2021). The rise of moral capitalism: Assessing the impact on business practices. *Journal of Business Ethics*, 175(3), 425-440.
Li, J. L., Yang, Z., & Chen, J. (2024). How does ESG performance empower corporate green technological innovation? Micro-evidence from Chinese listed companies. *Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management*, 38(05), 1-17.
Qiu, M. Y., & Yin, H. (2019). Corporate ESG performance and financing costs under the background of ecological civilization construction. *Journal of Quantitative & Technical Economics*, 36(03), 108-123.
Engelhardt, N., Ekkenga, J., & Posch, P. (2021). ESG Ratings and Stock Performance during the COVID-19 Crisis. *Sustainability*, 13(13), 7133.
Li, W. A. (2003). Research on the internal constraint mechanism of corporate credit based on corporate governance. *Tianjin: Nankai University*, 2003-06-05. (Unpublished)
Zhang, W., & Zhou, Z. D. (2024). Research on the construction of ESG performance evaluation system for logistics enterprises under the background of "dual carbon". *Logistics Sci-Tech*, 47(18), 27-31.
Du, M., Yang, H. M., Xu, D., Fang, J. H., Liu, Y., & Zhao, N. (2024). Exploration on the construction of a multi-dimensional value evaluation system for listed enterprises: A case study of oil engineering technology service and oil & petrochemical companies. *International Petroleum Economics*, 32(08), 80-88.
Wang, K., Li, K. X., & Qu, R. (2022). Thoughts on the construction of China's ESG ecosystem. *Finance and Accounting*, (10), 80.
Bai, M. R., & Zhang, J. X. (2022). Exploration on the construction path of ESG information disclosure system for listed companies. *Finance and Accounting Monthly*, (07), 90-99.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dong Fan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
 
						 
							 
			
		 
			 
			 
				









