Research on the Tolerance of Privacy Leakage Among Consumers in Offline Retail Shopping Scenarios

Authors

  • Weizhen Wang School of Business Administration, Jimei University
  • Minglei Li Guangdong Vocational Institute of Public Administration
  • Enyi Lai Fujian Zhongdian Straits Institute of Intelligent Equipment

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62177/apemr.v2i2.246

Keywords:

Privacy Leakage, Consumer, Artificial Intelligence, Attitude Measurement

Abstract

With the continuous combination of artificial intelligence technology and the field of security, intelligent security is gradually popularized in offline retail scenes. While helping merchants to obtain and analyze consumer data and bringing certain consumption convenience to consumers, it also brings practical problems of privacy leakage. The CCTV 315 gala revealed the use of AI technology to obtain users' privacy information, helping consumers truly realize that they still need to protect their privacy information in the offline retail scene. By investigating the tolerance of privacy leakage in consumers' offline retail shopping scenarios, this paper hopes to explore how to better build a shopping environment between consumers and offline retail stores. After integrating the sensitivity of consumers' information type, the sensitivity of information receiving, information use sensitivity and related privacy theory, this paper developed and designed a third-order seventh scale. We collected data through questionnaire survey method, a total of 237 questionnaires were collected, and used to analyze the data and reliability test with SPSS software. The analysis proves that most consumers do not have a high tolerance for privacy leakage. Although there are differences between personalities, there is a centralized trend. Finally, this paper further reflects on how to build a better shopping environment and consumer experience of offline stores.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baghai, K. (2012). Privacy as a human right: A sociological theory. Sociology, 46(5), 951-965. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038512450804

Berendt, B., Günther, O., & Spiekermann, S. (2005). Privacy in e-commerce: Stated preferences vs. actual behavior. Communications of the ACM, 48(4), 101-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/1053291.1053295

Brandeis, L., & Warren, S. (1890). The right to privacy. Harvard Law Review, 4(5), 193-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1321160

de Cosmo, L. M., Piper, L., & Di Vittorio, A. (2021). The role of attitude toward chatbots and privacy concern on the relationship between attitude toward mobile advertising and behavioral intent to use chatbots. Italian Journal of Marketing, 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43039-021-00020-1

Dinev, T., Hart, P., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Internet privacy concerns and beliefs about government surveillance–An empirical investigation. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(3), 214-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2007.09.002

Federal Trade Commission. (1996). Consumer information privacy hearings [online]. http://www.ftc.gov

Gandy Jr, O. H. (1993). African Americans and privacy: Understanding the black perspective in the emerging policy debate. Journal of Black Studies, 24(2), 178-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002193479302400204

Govani, T., & Pashley, H. (2005). Student awareness of the privacy implications when using Facebook. Privacy Policy, Law, and Technology Course. Carnegie Mellon University.

Hallahan, T. A., Faff, R. W., & McKenzie, M. D. (2004). An empirical investigation of personal financial risk tolerance. Financial Services Review, 13(1), 57-78.

Hsu, C. W. J. (2006). Privacy concerns, privacy practices and web site categories: Toward a situational paradigm. Online Information Review. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520610706433

Li, Y. (2014). A multi-level model of individual information privacy beliefs. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 13(1), 32-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2013.08.002

Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2009). Avoidance of information technology threats: A theoretical perspective. MIS Quarterly, 71-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/20650279

Rajivan, P., & Camp, J. (2016). Influence of privacy attitude and privacy cue framing on android app choices. In Twelfth Symposium on Usable Privacy and Security ({SOUPS} 2016).

Sheehan, K. B. (2002). Toward a typology of Internet users and online privacy concerns. The Information Society, 18(1), 21-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240252818207

Spiekermann, S., Grossklags, J., & Berendt, B. (2001, October). E-privacy in 2nd generation E-commerce: Privacy preferences versus actual behavior. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on Electronic Commerce (pp. 38-47). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/501158.501163

Strahilevitz, L. J. (2005). A social networks theory of privacy. The University of Chicago Law Review, 919-988.

Tavani, H. T. (2007). Philosophical theories of privacy: Implications for an adequate online privacy policy. Metaphilosophy, 38(1), 1-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2006.00474.x

Westin, A. F. (1968). Privacy and freedom. Washington and Lee Law Review, 25(1), 166.

Yang, H. (2012). Young American consumers' prior negative experience of online disclosure, online privacy concerns, and privacy protection behavioral intent. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction & Complaining Behavior, 25, 179-202.

Downloads

How to Cite

Wang, W., Li, M., & Lai, E. (2025). Research on the Tolerance of Privacy Leakage Among Consumers in Offline Retail Shopping Scenarios. Asia Pacific Economic and Management Review, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.62177/apemr.v2i2.246

Issue

Section

Articles

DATE

Received: 2025-04-19
Accepted: 2025-04-24
Published: 2025-04-24