Structural Resilience and Institutional Response: An Empirical Study of Economic Recovery Pathways in UK Cities Following the COVID-19 Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62177/apemr.v3i5.1862Keywords:
Post-Pandemic Economic Recovery, Regional Inequality, Spatial Divergence, Fixed-Effects Mode, UK Cities, Agglomeration Economies, Welfare Expenditure, CambridgeAbstract
The study empirically examines city-level data in the UK for 2019-2023, systematically accounting for the spatial divergence and the drivers of it along three main lines of inquiry: the recovery of incomes, the recovery of welfare spending, and the recovery of regional inequality following the COVID-19 pandemic, using a fixed-effects panel model approach. The results show a strong “Matthew Effect” in the recovery after the pandemic. Higher-skilled, industrial and institutional cities like metros and tech cities like Cambridge had a stronger performance regarding income and welfare security, even having net positive growth. Concurrently, this agglomerative effect deepened regional disparities and intra-metropolitan inequities. Correspondingly, this agglomeration effect resulted in growing inequities both between regions and within large cities. The study suggests that the pandemic was far from a uniform shock but reinforced the spatial disparity of the UK economy as a result of a myriad of structural and institutional changes. Policies need to transcend the limiting growth paradigm focused on maximizing efficiency and implement a competitiveness-oriented development pathway that includes regional equity. This can be done by focusing investments in education, digital infrastructure and industrial policies to stem further geographical inequality.
Downloads
References
Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Insight – Welcome to Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Insight. (n.d.). https://cambridgeshireinsight.org.uk/
Correia, S. (2017). Linear models with high-dimensional fixed effects: An efficient and feasible estimator. Unpublished manuscript, http://scorreia. com/research/hdfe. pdf (last accessed 25 October 2019), 4(2).
Glaeser, E. L., Gorback, C., & Redding, S. J. (2022). JUE Insight: How much does COVID-19 increase with mobility? Evidence from New York and four other U.S. cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 127, 103292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2020.103292
Habimana, V. (2024). Impact of COVID 19 pandemic to different economic sectors in the UK. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4885152
Johnston, R., Khattab, N., & Manley, D. (2014). East versus West? Over-qualification and Earnings among the UK’s European Migrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(2), 196–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2014.935308
Moretti, E. (2021). The New Geography of Jobs: How the Pandemic Accelerated Spatial Inequality. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 52(1), 1-58.
Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2019). Housing, urban growth and inequalities: The limits to deregulation and upzoning in reducing economic and spatial inequality. Urban Studies, 57(2), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019859458
UK Data Service. (2025, May 1). Homepage - UK Data Service. https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zihe Wang

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








