Structural Resilience and Institutional Response: An Empirical Study of Economic Recovery Pathways in UK Cities Following the COVID-19 Pandemic

Authors

  • Zihe Wang University of Cambridge

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62177/apemr.v3i5.1862

Keywords:

Post-Pandemic Economic Recovery, Regional Inequality, Spatial Divergence, Fixed-Effects Mode, UK Cities, Agglomeration Economies, Welfare Expenditure, Cambridge

Abstract

The study empirically examines city-level data in the UK for 2019-2023, systematically accounting for the spatial divergence and the drivers of it along three main lines of inquiry: the recovery of incomes, the recovery of welfare spending, and the recovery of regional inequality following the COVID-19 pandemic, using a fixed-effects panel model approach. The results show a strong “Matthew Effect” in the recovery after the pandemic. Higher-skilled, industrial and institutional cities like metros and tech cities like Cambridge had a stronger performance regarding income and welfare security, even having net positive growth. Concurrently, this agglomerative effect deepened regional disparities and intra-metropolitan inequities. Correspondingly, this agglomeration effect resulted in growing inequities both between regions and within large cities. The study suggests that the pandemic was far from a uniform shock but reinforced the spatial disparity of the UK economy as a result of a myriad of structural and institutional changes. Policies need to transcend the limiting growth paradigm focused on maximizing efficiency and implement a competitiveness-oriented development pathway that includes regional equity. This can be done by focusing investments in education, digital infrastructure and industrial policies to stem further geographical inequality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Insight – Welcome to Cambridgeshire & Peterborough Insight. (n.d.). https://cambridgeshireinsight.org.uk/

Correia, S. (2017). Linear models with high-dimensional fixed effects: An efficient and feasible estimator. Unpublished manuscript, http://scorreia. com/research/hdfe. pdf (last accessed 25 October 2019), 4(2).

Glaeser, E. L., Gorback, C., & Redding, S. J. (2022). JUE Insight: How much does COVID-19 increase with mobility? Evidence from New York and four other U.S. cities. Journal of Urban Economics, 127, 103292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2020.103292

Habimana, V. (2024). Impact of COVID 19 pandemic to different economic sectors in the UK. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4885152

Johnston, R., Khattab, N., & Manley, D. (2014). East versus West? Over-qualification and Earnings among the UK’s European Migrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 41(2), 196–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183x.2014.935308

Moretti, E. (2021). The New Geography of Jobs: How the Pandemic Accelerated Spatial Inequality. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 52(1), 1-58.

Rodríguez-Pose, A., & Storper, M. (2019). Housing, urban growth and inequalities: The limits to deregulation and upzoning in reducing economic and spatial inequality. Urban Studies, 57(2), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019859458

UK Data Service. (2025, May 1). Homepage - UK Data Service. https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/

Downloads

How to Cite

Wang, Z. (2026). Structural Resilience and Institutional Response: An Empirical Study of Economic Recovery Pathways in UK Cities Following the COVID-19 Pandemic. Asia Pacific Economic and Management Review, 3(5). https://doi.org/10.62177/apemr.v3i5.1862

Issue

Section

Articles