Dynamic Monitoring of Banking Systemic Risk: An Analysis Based on Smooth Quantile-LSTM Model

Authors

  • Chun Hou Xi’an Polytechnic University
  • Shuanghua Luo Xi’an Polytechnic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62177/apemr.v3i5.1846

Keywords:

Systemic Risk, ΔCoVaR, Smooth Quantile Regression, LSTM, Macroprudential Regulation

Abstract

Preventing systemic risk is a core task of macroprudential supervision, and accurately measuring the marginal contribution of individual banks to systemic risk remains a key challenge. To address the estimation bias of traditional parametric models in characterizing extreme tail risk, this paper constructs a Smooth Quantile Long Short-Term Memory (SQ-LSTM) model and conducts an empirical analysis using daily return data of 14 European Global Systemically Important Banks identified by the Financial Stability Board from 2008 to 2021. The model introduces the Horowitz smooth kernel to reformulate the traditional quantile loss function so that it is differentiable over the entire domain, employs LSTM gating mechanisms to capture long-term dependencies and regime-switching features of financial time series, and uses a multi-output neural network to simultaneously estimate VaR and CoVaR for all institutions. The empirical results show that SQ-LSTM is highly responsive to extreme events, with ΔCoVaR peaks closely coinciding with major shocks such as the 2008 financial crisis, the 2011 European debt crisis, Brexit in 2016, and the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020; risk rankings remain highly stable throughout the sample period, with Spearman correlation coefficients consistently above 0.80; and out-of-sample rolling forecasts with Diebold–Mariano tests confirm that, at the 1% extreme quantile level, SQ-LSTM achieves significantly higher prediction accuracy than the benchmark Q-LSTM model. This study provides a distribution-free, robust, and sensitive quantitative framework for identifying systemically important institutions and dynamically monitoring systemic risk.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kupiec, P., & Nickerson, D. (2004). Assessing systemic risk exposure GSEs under alternative approaches to capital regulation. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 28(2), 123–145.

Zhu, B., Li, L., Zhou, Y., & Wang, H. (2019). How does information disclosure affect bank systemic risk in the presence of a deposit insurance system? Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(11), 2497–2522.

Billio, M., Getmansky, M., Lo, A. W., & Pelizzon, L. (2012). Econometric measures of connectedness and systemic risk in the finance and insurance sectors. Journal of Financial Economics, 104(3), 535–559.

Akgüller, Ö., & Balcı, M. A. (2026). Detecting financial contagion through higher-order networks: a deep learning approach to emerging market risk. Computational Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-025-11287-3

Caporin, M., Costola, M., & Garibal, J. C. (2022). Systemic risk and severe economic downturns: A targeted and sparse analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 134, 106339.

Acharya, V. V., Pedersen, L. H., Philippon, T., & Richardson, M. (2017). Measuring systemic risk. The Review of Financial Studies, 30(1), 2–47.

Leonardo, M. B., Giovanni, L. D., & Giorgia, R. (2023). Non-Gaussian models for CoVaR estimation. International Journal of Forecasting, 39(1), 391–404.

Yao, C. Z., & Li, M. J. (2023). GARCH-MIDAS-GAS-copula model for CoVaR and risk spillover in stock markets. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 66, 101910.

Giglio, S., Kelly, B., & Pruitt, S. (2016). Systemic risk and the macroeconomy: An empirical evaluation. Journal of Financial Economics, 119(3), 457–471.

Ding, Z. X., Granger, C. W. J., & Engle, R. F. (2001). A long memory property of stock market returns and a new model. In C. W. J. Granger (Ed.), Essays in econometrics: Collected papers of Clive W. J. Granger (pp. 349–372). Cambridge University Press.

Zhao, S. J. (2022). Systemic risk measurement: A limiting threshold copula approach to CoVaR. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 171, 108464.

Yang, L., Yang, L., Ho, K., & Wang, Y. (2020). Dependence structures and risk spillover in China’s credit bond market: A copula and CoVaR approach. Journal of Asian Economics, 68, 101200.

Zhang, X., & Wei, C. (2023). Systemic risk of Chinese financial institutions and asset price bubbles. North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 64, 101880.

Chen, X., Zhou, L., Wang, L., & Liu, H. (2023). Risk spillover in China’s real estate industry chain: a DCC-EGARCH-ΔCoVaR model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–16.

Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780.

Taylor, W. J. (2000). A quantile regression neural network approach to estimating the conditional density of multiperiod returns. Journal of Forecasting, 19(4), 299–311.

Cannon, A. J. (2011). Quantile regression neural networks: Implementation in R and application to precipitation downscaling. Computers & Geosciences, 37(9), 1277–1284.

He, Y., Qin, Y., Wang, S., & Li, J. (2019). Electricity consumption probability density forecasting method based on LASSO-Quantile Regression Neural Network. Applied Energy, 233, 565–575.

Zhu, B., Wei, Y., Zhang, L., & Li, Y. (2020). Forecasting carbon price using empirical mode decomposition and quantile regression neural network. Journal of Cleaner Production, 275, 122842.

Aprea, I. L., Scognamiglio, S., & Zanetti, P. (2024). Systemic risk measurement: A Quantile Long Short-Term Memory network approach. Applied Soft Computing, 152, 111224.

Horowitz, J. L. (1998). Bootstrap methods for median regression models. Econometrica, 66(6), 1327–1351.

Koenker, R., & Bassett, J. G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33–50.

Downloads

How to Cite

Hou, C., & Luo, S. (2026). Dynamic Monitoring of Banking Systemic Risk: An Analysis Based on Smooth Quantile-LSTM Model. Asia Pacific Economic and Management Review, 3(5). https://doi.org/10.62177/apemr.v3i5.1846

Issue

Section

Articles