Escaping the All-Star Trap: Reshaping Leadership in Growth-Stage Technology Enterprises—Observations Based on Dynamic Capabilities Theory and Empirical Evidence from the Chinese Context
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62177/apemr.v3i5.1755Keywords:
Growth-Stage Technology Enterprises, Transformational Leadership, Top Management Team Heterogeneity, Dynamic Capabilities, Specialized, Refined, Distinctive, and Innovative (SRDI) EnterprisesAbstract
Growth-stage technology enterprises often fall into the trap of stacking up “all-star” talent. Drawing on dynamic capabilities theory and upper echelons theory, together with empirical research in the Chinese context, this paper points out that top management team (TMT) heterogeneity has an inverted U-shaped relationship with corporate digital transformation, and that excessive diversity triggers cognitive conflict and internal friction. Reshaping leadership in technology enterprises should proceed on three levels: at the capability level, building a dynamic “sensing–seizing–reconfiguring” closed loop; at the team level, seeking the “golden ratio” of cognitive complementarity and constructing a flexible “stable core + agile edge” architecture; and at the organizational level, driving the founder’s cognitive leap from chief technology officer (CTO) to chief strategy officer (CSO) and establishing a decision sandbox mechanism that supports ambidextrous learning—ultimately completing a paradigm shift from individual heroism to a symbiotic organizational system.
Downloads
References
Hao, X. L., Chen, R. B., Gou, Y. P., et al. (2026). The inverted U-shaped effect of top management team heterogeneity on corporate digital transformation: The mediating effect of entrepreneurial orientation. Journal of Industrial Technological Economics, 45(1), 90-99. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-910X.2026.01.009 (in Chinese)
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640
Schoemaker, P. J. H., Heaton, S., & Teece, D. (2018). Innovation, dynamic capabilities, and leadership. California Management Review, 61(1), 15-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125618790246
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193-206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/258434
Wang, K., He, J. J., Zhang, X. D., et al. (2025). Unraveling the performance puzzle of digital transformation: The moderating role of TMT heterogeneity and faultline strength. Journal of Business Research, 188, 115076. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2024.115076
Zhang, W., Cheng, N., Li, Q. Y., et al. (2025). The digital odyssey: Why management team stability matters for corporate transformation. Finance Research Letters, 86, 108808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2025.108808
Tan, Z. (2024). Top management team stability and corporate innovation sustainability. Sustainability, 16(11), 4496. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16114496
Ye, H. Y., & Yu, T. (2025). Executive team stability, organizational resilience, and innovation quality in SRDI enterprises: The moderating role of managerial autonomy. West Forum on Economy and Management, 36(2), 90-104. (in Chinese)
Qu, X. J. (2025, May 27). How technology unicorns can navigate cycles and sustain growth. Retrieved September 9, 2026, from https://www.mckinsey.com.cn/科技行业独角兽如何穿越周期、保持增长/ (in Chinese)
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
O'Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2013.0025
Raisch, S., & Birkinshaw, J. (2008). Organizational ambidexterity: Antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. Journal of Management, 34(3), 375-409. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316058
Bai, Y., You, X., & Sun, Y. (2025). Transformational leadership, dual innovation, and organizational resilience. Current Psychology, 44, 17455-17473. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-08478-4
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Yue Wei

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








