Selective Multiculturalism and Strategic Connectivity: Representing Malaysia as a Trade, Tourism, and Cultural Gateway in China Daily
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62177/apemr.v3i4.1603Keywords:
Malaysia, China Daily, Representation, Multiculturalism, Civilizational Bridge, Qualitative Content AnalysisAbstract
This study examines how Malaysia is represented in China Daily, focusing on the construction of multicultural identity and Malaysia’s positioning between China, ASEAN, and the Muslim world. Guided exclusively by Stuart Hall’s theory of representation, the study treats news discourse not as a transparent reflection of Malaysia but as a meaning-producing practice organized through selection, visibility, association, and absence. A qualitative content analysis was conducted on 20 English-language articles published by China Daily between September 1, 2023, and April 30, 2025. The articles were purposively selected from cultural, political, economic, heritage, and tourism coverage in which Malaysia was the central subject. Two themes were identified. First, China Daily constructed selective multiculturalism by placing Chinese diasporic heritage at the center of Malaysian diversity while translating cultural plurality into food, festivals, tourism, and harmonious coexistence. Second, Malaysia was represented as a civilizational bridge through historical connections, particularly Malacca and Zheng He, and through contemporary intermediary roles involving ASEAN diplomacy, halal trade, infrastructure, education, and tourism. The study argues that Malaysia is granted visibility and agency, but mainly in forms compatible with cooperation, connectivity, and mutual benefit. This representation makes Malaysia simultaneously culturally familiar and strategically useful within China-centered regional narratives.
Downloads
References
Edney, K. (2012). Soft power and the Chinese propaganda system. Journal of Contemporary China, 21(78), 899–914. doi:10.1080/10670564.2012.701031
Fan, Y., Pan, J., & Sheng, J. (2024). Strategies of Chinese state media on Twitter. Political Communication, 41(1), 4–25. doi:10.1080/10584609.2023.2233911
Rawnsley, G. D. (2015). To know us is to love us: Public diplomacy and international broadcasting in contemporary Russia and China. Politics, 35(3–4), 273–286. doi:10.1111/1467-9256.12104
Zhu, Y. (2022). China’s “new cultural diplomacy” in international broadcasting: Branding the nation through CGTN Documentary. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 28(6), 671–683. doi:10.1
Hall, S., Evans, J., & Nixon, S. (Eds.). (2013). Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices (2nd ed.). Sage.
Noor, N. M., & Leong, C. H. (2013). Multiculturalism in Malaysia and Singapore: Contesting models. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37(6), 714–726. doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2013.09.009
Fee, L. K., & Appudurai, J. (2011). Race, class and politics in Peninsular Malaysia: The general election of 2008. Asian Studies Review, 35(1), 63–82. doi:10.1080/10357823.2011.552706
Harris, A., & Han, A. (2020). 1Malaysia? Young people and everyday multiculturalism in multiracialized Malaysia. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 43(5), 816–834. doi:10.1080/01419870.2019.1580379
Koh, S. Y., & Harris, A. (2020). Multicultural reflexivity: University students negotiating “pockets” and “strings” of multiculturalism in Malaysia. Children’s Geographies, 18(6), 712–725. doi:10.1080/14733285.2020.1713300
Verkuyten, M., & Khan, A. (2012). Interethnic relations in Malaysia: Group identifications, indispensability and inclusive nationhood. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 15(2), 132–139. doi:10.1111/j.1467-839X.2012.01374.x
Matthews, J., & Zain, H. B. (2022). Creating one nation? Ethno-national imaginaries, audiences and the critical reception of TV nation-branding messages. Nations and Nationalism, 28(4), 1296–1310. doi:10.1111/nana.12829
Elo, S., Kääriäinen, M., Kanste, O., Pölkki, T., Utriainen, K., & Kyngäs, H. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: A focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open, 4(1), 1–10. doi:10.1177/2158244014522633
Graneheim, U. H., Lindgren, B. M., & Lundman, B. (2017). Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper. Nurse Education Today, 56, 29–34. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2017.06.002
Lindgren, B. M., Lundman, B., & Graneheim, U. H. (2020). Abstraction and interpretation during the qualitative content analysis process. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 108, Article 103632. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103632
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Chengming Liu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
DATE
Accepted: 2026-07-27
Published: 2026-08-14








