A Study on the Development of a Carbon Accounting Disclosure Framework for the Coal Industry Under the TCFD
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62177/apemr.v3i4.1570Keywords:
Carbon Accounting Disclosure, Coal Industry, TCFD, Financial Impacts, Connectivity, Assurance SupportAbstract
Against the backdrop of the ongoing advancement of the “dual carbon” goals and the continuous refinement of international sustainable disclosure standards, the coal industry—as a typical high-carbon sector—is facing multiple challenges, including emission reduction constraints, pressure to transition, and revaluation by capital markets. Carbon accounting disclosure is no longer merely an expression of environmental responsibility but is gradually becoming a critical information mechanism linking corporate governance, strategic decision-making, risk management, and the identification of financial impacts.The TCFD framework, centered on the four pillars of governance, strategy, risk management, and metrics and targets, provides a relatively mature international paradigm for corporate climate-related financial disclosure. However, its application in the coal industry still faces issues such as fragmented disclosure content, insufficient quantification, inadequate disclosure of financial impacts, weak connectivity between reports, and insufficient assurance support.Given the coal industry’s characteristics of high emissions, high sunk costs, and long-term investment cycles, this paper, based on a review of relevant research and practical realities, proposes that the carbon accounting disclosure system for the coal industry should be structured around seven key areas: governance mechanisms, strategic responses, risk management, metrics and targets, financial impacts, connectivity, and assurance support. Furthermore, it outlines an implementation pathway that combines phased implementation with data governance and external oversight.The study argues that carbon disclosure in the coal industry should shift from “compliance-oriented disclosure” to “decision-useful disclosure.” By enhancing disclosure quality through standardization, quantification, forward-looking perspectives, and verifiability, this approach will support corporate low-carbon transitions and regulatory governance.
Downloads
References
Shen, H. T. (2022). A study on carbon disclosure issues in China under the “dual carbon” goals. Accounting Friend, (9), 2–9.
Zeng, F. R., Li, J. R., Tao, C. H., et al. (2024). Accounting development under the “dual carbon” goals: Challenges and innovations. Accounting Friend, (12), 33–39.
Huang, S. Z. (2025). An analysis of the three major disclosure frameworks for sustainability information. Accounting Monthly, (11), 3–13.
Cao, Y. L., Yang, Z. M., & Wang, P. C. (2025). Disclosure and auditing practices regarding the financial impact of climate-related risks and opportunities. Accounting Monthly, (5), 23–33.
Wang, X. M., Long, Y. X., Xu, N. Z., et al. (2022). A study on carbon disclosure standards for listed companies from an environmental management perspective. Accounting Bulletin, (15), 11–16, 24.
Li, X. Y., & Shi, Y. Y. (2016). Green development, carbon disclosure quality, and financial performance. Economic Management, 38(7), 119–132.
Wang, Y., & Gu, Y. (2022). Reflections on carbon auditing in the context of the “dual carbon” goals. Accounting Friend, (18), 87–92.
Wang, Y. L., Zhang, Z. X., & Gai, Y. F. (2023). “Dual carbon” and factors affecting the quality of corporate carbon accounting disclosure: An empirical study based on listed companies in the steel sector. Accounting Friend, (9), 51–57.
Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. (2017). Final report: Recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures.
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Zhilei Li

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.








