Mapping Legitimacy Research in Business and Management: A CiteSpace-Based Bibliometric Review of Conceptual Diffusion and Thematic Evolution

Zerong Huang; Doudou Zi; Tao Wang

doi:10.62177/apemr.v3i3.1508

Authors

Zerong Huang Guangzhou Xinhua University
Doudou Zi Guangzhou Xinhua University
Tao Wang Guangzhou Xinhua University; INTI International University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62177/apemr.v3i3.1508

Keywords:

Legitimacy, Bibliometric Analysis, CiteSpace, Business and Management, Conceptual Diffusion, Thematic Evolution

Abstract

This study examines the diffusion and thematic evolution of legitimacy research in business and management. Based on 6,034 records from the Web of Science Core Collection covering 1997-2025, the paper uses descriptive statistics, co-citation analysis, keyword clustering, burst detection, and thematic evolution mapping to identify the field's publication patterns, knowledge structure, and research frontiers. The findings show that legitimacy has expanded from its institutional-theory foundations into entrepreneurship, CSR, sustainability reporting, ESG, governance accountability, international business, and digital platform studies. Rather than replacing earlier traditions, newer themes reconnect with classic questions of organizational recognition, audience judgment, disclosure, responsibility, and resource mobilization. The review further suggests that CSR, carbon disclosure, ESG performance, green innovation, artificial intelligence, and gender diversity have become active frontier topics. The paper argues that future research should specify the type of legitimacy being studied, the audiences making legitimacy judgments, and the evidence through which legitimacy is acquired, maintained, challenged, repaired, or lost.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340-363. DOI: 10.1086/226550.

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. DOI: 10.2307/2095101.

Scott, W. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities (4th ed.). SAGE.

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610. DOI: 10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331.

Singh, J. V., Tucker, D. J., & House, R. J. (1986). Organizational legitimacy and the liability of newness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 31(2), 171-193. DOI: 10.2307/2392787.

Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177-194. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1.2.177.

Elsbach, K. D. (1994). Managing organizational legitimacy in the California cattle industry: The construction and effectiveness of verbal accounts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(1), 57-88. DOI: 10.2307/2393494.

Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145-179. DOI: 10.5465/amr.1991.4279002.

Zimmerman, M. A., & Zeitz, G. J. (2002). Beyond survival: Achieving new venture growth by building legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 414-431. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2002.7389921.

Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (2001). Cultural entrepreneurship: Stories, legitimacy, and the acquisition of resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 545-564. DOI: 10.1002/smj.188.

Navis, C., & Glynn, M. A. (2010). How new market categories emerge: Temporal dynamics of legitimacy, identity, and entrepreneurship in satellite radio, 1990-2005. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(3), 439-471. DOI: 10.2189/asqu.2010.55.3.439.

Fisher, G., Kotha, S., & Lahiri, A. (2016). Changing with the times: An integrated view of identity, legitimacy, and new venture life cycles. Academy of Management Review, 41(3), 383-409. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2013.0496.

Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49-77). SAGE.

Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451-478. DOI: 10.5465/annals.2015.0101.

Deephouse, D. L., Bundy, J., Tost, L. P., et al. (2017). Organizational legitimacy: Six key questions. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, T. B. Lawrence, & R. E. Meyer (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (2nd ed., pp. 27-54). SAGE.

Bitektine, A. (2011). Toward a theory of social judgments of organizations: The case of legitimacy, reputation, and status. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 151-179. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2009.0382.

Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2015). The macro and the micro of legitimacy: Toward a multilevel theory of the legitimacy process. Academy of Management Review, 40(1), 49-75. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2013.0318.

Tost, L. P. (2011). An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 686-710. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2010.0227.

Deephouse, D. L., & Carter, S. M. (2005). An examination of differences between organizational legitimacy and organizational reputation. Journal of Management Studies, 42(2), 329-360. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2005.00499.x.

Deegan, C. (2002). The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures: A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(3), 282-311. DOI: 10.1108/09513570210435852.

Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2007). The role of environmental disclosures as tools of legitimacy: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7-8), 639-647. DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.009.

Cho, C. H., Laine, M., Roberts, R. W., et al. (2015). Organized hypocrisy, organizational facades, and sustainability reporting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 40, 78-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.aos.2014.12.003.

Kostova, T., & Zaheer, S. (1999). Organizational legitimacy under conditions of complexity: The case of the multinational enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 64-81. DOI: 10.5465/amr.1999.1580441.

Marano, V., Tashman, P., & Kostova, T. (2017). Escaping the iron cage: Liabilities of origin and CSR reporting of emerging market multinational enterprises. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(3), 386-408. DOI: 10.1057/jibs.2016.17.

Tashman, P., Marano, V., & Kostova, T. (2019). Walking the walk or talking the talk? Corporate social responsibility decoupling in emerging market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(2), 153-171. DOI: 10.1057/s41267-018-0171-7.

Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 71-88. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-006-9044-2.

Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Seidl, D. (2013). Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments: Sustainable development in a globalized world. Journal of Management Studies, 50(2), 259-284. DOI: 10.1111/joms.12014.

Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management, and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93-103. DOI: 10.5465/20159562.

Zupic, I., & Cater, T. (2015). Bibliometric methods in management and organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. DOI: 10.1177/1094428114562629.

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., et al. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.

Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359-377. DOI: 10.1002/asi.20317.

Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. DOI: 10.1002/asi.4630240406.

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.

Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. Wiley.

Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45-80. DOI: 10.1108/00220410810844150.

Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139192675.

Taeuscher, K. (2019). Reputation and new venture performance in online markets: The moderating role of market crowding. Journal of Business Venturing, 34(6), 105944. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.06.005.

Saebi, T., Foss, N. J., & Linder, S. (2019). Social entrepreneurship research: Past achievements and future promises. Journal of Management, 45(1), 70-95. DOI: 10.1177/0149206318793196.

Gillespie, N., Lockey, S., & Curtis, C. (2021). Trust in artificial intelligence: A five country study. University of Queensland and KPMG Australia. DOI: 10.14264/e34bfa3.

Hahn, R., & Kuhnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005.

Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003.

Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 26(7), 1036-1071. DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-04-2012-00998.

Etzion, D., & Ferraro, F. (2010). The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organization Science, 21(5), 1092-1107. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1090.0494.

Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., et al. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317-371. DOI: 10.1080/19416520.2011.590299.

Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455-476. DOI: 10.5465/amr.35.3.zok455.

Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199601936.001.0001.

Delmas, M. A., & Burbano, V. C. (2011). The drivers of greenwashing. California Management Review, 54(1), 64-87. DOI: 10.1525/cmr.2011.54.1.64.

Lyon, T. P., & Montgomery, A. W. (2015). The means and end of greenwash. Organization & Environment, 28(2), 223-249. DOI: 10.1177/1086026615575332.

Marquis, C., Toffel, M. W., & Zhou, Y. (2016). Scrutiny, norms, and selective disclosure: A global study of greenwashing. Organization Science, 27(2), 483-504. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2015.1039.

Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2013). CSR as aspirational talk. Organization, 20(3), 372-393. DOI: 10.1177/1350508413478310.

Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984.

Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2015). The impact of corporate social responsibility on investment recommendations: Analysts' perceptions and shifting institutional logics. Strategic Management Journal, 36(7), 1053-1081. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2268.

Kolbel, J. F., Busch, T., & Jancso, L. M. (2017). How media coverage of corporate social irresponsibility increases financial risk. Strategic Management Journal, 38(11), 2266-2284. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2647.

Clementino, E., & Perkins, R. (2021). How do companies respond to environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(2), 379-397. DOI: 10.1007/s10551-020-04441-4.

Mair, J., Mayer, J., & Lutz, E. (2015). Navigating institutional plurality: Organizational governance in hybrid organizations. Organization Studies, 36(6), 713-739. DOI: 10.1177/0170840615580007.

Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing: Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397-441. DOI: 10.5465/19416520.2014.893615.

Nambisan, S., Wright, M., & Feldman, M. (2019). The digital transformation of innovation and entrepreneurship: Progress, challenges and key themes. Research Policy, 48(8), 103773. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2019.03.018.

George, G., Merrill, R. K., & Schillebeeckx, S. J. D. (2021). Digital sustainability and entrepreneurship: How digital innovations are helping tackle climate change and sustainable development. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 999-1027. DOI: 10.1177/1042258719899425.