The Internationalisation Challenges of Chinese SMEs: Formation Mechanisms and Governance Pathways

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62177/apemr.v3i3.1485

Keywords:

SMEs, Internationalisation, Global Value Chains, Trade Finance, Compliance Costs

Abstract

Against the backdrop of expanding foreign trade, a rising share of private enterprises and rapid growth in cross-border e-commerce, the internationalisation of Chinese SMEs shows a dual pattern: more market entry points and deeper capability constraints. Evidence from the General Administration of Customs, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, the World Bank, the WTO, UNCTAD, ADB and EU regulatory materials, combined with gradual internationalisation theory, global value-chain analysis and the born-global literature, indicates that the difficulties facing SMEs do not stem from a lack of overseas demand. They arise from a structural mismatch between firm capabilities and external rules. Low-price orders can lock firms into lower positions in global value chains; data-intensive compliance rules raise fixed costs; insufficient trade finance worsens cash-flow pressure; platform-based internationalisation weakens the accumulation of customer assets; and weak organisational capability prevents experience from becoming sustained competitiveness. Governance should therefore shift from entry indicators, such as export value, store numbers and trade-fair participation, to capability indicators, such as profit margins, collection cycles, compliance completeness, repurchase rates, financing coverage and after-sales response. Sectoral compliance tools, scenario-based trade finance, public services for industrial clusters and stronger internal governance can help Chinese SMEs move from 'products going global' to 'capabilities going global'.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asian Development Bank. (2025). ADB Global Trade Finance Gap Survey. https://www.adb.org/publications/adb-global-trade-finance-gap-survey

Cavusgil, S. T., & Knight, G. (2015). The born global firm: An entrepreneurial and capabilities perspective on early and rapid internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1), 3-16.

Council of the European Union. (2025). Deforestation: Council signs off targeted revision to simplify and postpone the regulation. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2025/12/18/deforestation-council-signs-off-targeted-revision-to-simplify-and-postpone-the-regulation/

Dunning, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1-31.

European Commission. (2026). Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. https://taxation-customs.ec.europa.eu/carbon-border-adjustment-mechanism_en

Freeman, S., Edwards, R., & Schroder, B. (2006). How smaller born-global firms use networks and alliances to overcome constraints to rapid internationalization. Journal of International Marketing, 14(3), 33-63.

Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78-104.

Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23-32.

Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 124-141.

Leonidou, L. C. (2004). An analysis of the barriers hindering small business export development. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(3), 279-302.

Lu, J. W., & Beamish, P. W. (2001). The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6-7), 565-586.

OECD. (2009). Top barriers and drivers to SME internationalisation. OECD Working Party on SMEs and Entrepreneurship.

Oviatt, B. M., & McDougall, P. P. (1994). Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(1), 45-64.

UN Trade and Development. (2026). Global Trade Update: April 2026. https://unctad.org/publication/global-trade-update-april-2026-global-trade-growth-continues-fragility-rises

World Bank. (2025). Enterprise Surveys: China 2024 Country Profile. https://www.enterprisesurveys.org/content/dam/enterprisesurveys/documents/country/China-2024.pdf

World Trade Organization. (2026). Global Trade Outlook and Statistics: March 2026. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/gtos0326_e.htm

Zaheer, S. (1995). Overcoming the liability of foreignness. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 341-363.

China Government Network. (2025). China's foreign trade exceeded RMB 43 trillion in 2024, reaching a new record high. https://www.gov.cn/lianbo/bumen/202501/content_6998197.htm

China Government Network. (2025). Chart: China's cross-border e-commerce imports and exports grew by 10.8% in 2024. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/jiedu/tujie/202501/content_6998286.htm

MIIT-related releases. (2026). China has cultivated more than 140,000 specialised and sophisticated SMEs. https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/shipin/202501/content_6996829.htm

General Administration of Customs. (2026). China's total import and export value exceeded RMB 45 trillion in 2025, reaching a historical high. https://www.ce.cn/xwzx/gnsz/gdxw/202601/t20260114_2701371.shtml

General Administration of Customs. (2026). Cross-border e-commerce imports and exports reached RMB 2.75 trillion in 2025, 69.7% higher than in 2020. https://www.ce.cn/xwzx/gnsz/gdxw/202601/t20260114_2700917.shtml

Downloads

How to Cite

Cao, H., & Gan, W. (2026). The Internationalisation Challenges of Chinese SMEs: Formation Mechanisms and Governance Pathways. Asia Pacific Economic and Management Review, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.62177/apemr.v3i3.1485

Issue

Section

Articles

DATE

Received: 2026-06-02
Accepted: 2026-06-05
Published: 2026-06-12