Hybrid Selection and Adaptive Strategies with Clustering Strategies for Solving Multi-Objective Optimization Problems

Authors

  • Manyuan Li Xi’an Polytechnic University
  • Meng Wen Xi’an Polytechnic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62177/apemr.v3i3.1396

Keywords:

Multi-Objective Optimizatio, Genetic Algorithm, Hybrid Initialization, Two-Layer Selectio, Adaptive Crossover and Mutation

Abstract

In response to the shortcomings of the classic multi-objective optimization algorithm NSGA-II, such as slow convergence speed, difficulty in maintaining population diversity, and tendency to get trapped in local optima when solving complex problems, an improved fast elite multi-objective genetic algorithm (HSA-MOEA) that integrates hybrid initialization strategy, double-layer selection mechanism, adaptive crossover mutation, and particle swarm optimization (PSO) enhancement strategy is proposed. This algorithm improves in three core aspects: initial population construction, selection mechanism design, and evolutionary operator optimization. It adopts a hybrid initialization strategy combining Latin hypercube and boundary focused sampling to enhance the quality of the initial population; designs a double-layer selection mechanism including fast non-dominated sorting, adaptive crowding degree calculation, k-means++ clustering, and binary tournament selection to balance convergence and population diversity; constructs an adaptive operator combination of simulated binary crossover, uniform crossover, polynomial mutation, and Gaussian mutation to achieve a smooth transition between global exploration and local exploitation; combines PSO enhancement strategy to accelerate the convergence rate of elite individuals. Using the ZDT1-ZDT4 and DTLZ1-DTLZ8 series of standard test functions as verification carriers, the HSA-MOEA is compared with classic algorithms such as NSGA-II, NSGA-III, MOEA-D, and IBEA through experimental comparisons. The performance evaluation indicators used are reverse generation distance (IGD), generation distance (GD), and super volume (HV), and statistical verification is conducted using the Wilcoxon paired rank test. The experimental results show that HSA-MOEA significantly outperforms the comparison algorithms in terms of convergence accuracy, distribution uniformity of the solution set, and robustness, especially in complex multi-objective optimization problems with multiple peaks, non-convexity, and discontinuous frontiers. Applying this algorithm to the multi-objective path planning problem of robots, with path length, smoothness, and safety as optimization goals, the experimental results in a 20×20 grid map show that the optimized path length is shortened by 5.0%, the smoothness is increased by 89.4%, and the safety distance remains stable, verifying the effectiveness and practicality of HSA-MOEA in practical engineering problems. This algorithm provides a new effective approach for solving complex multi-objective optimization problems and has good application prospects in intelligent optimization and autonomous navigation fields.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Deb, K. (2001). Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. John Wiley & Sons.

Qin, H., & Zhou, J. Z. (2010). Multi-objective cultured differential evolution for generating optimal trade-offs in reservoir flood control operation. Water Resources Management, 24(11), 2611–2632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-009-9570-7

Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., & Meyarivan, T. (2002). A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(2), 182–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/4235.996017

Coello, C. A. C., Toscano Pulido, G., & Mezura Montes, E. (2005). Current and future research trends in evolutionary multiobjective optimization. In Evolutionary multi-criterion optimization (pp. 213–230). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/b106458

Zhang, Q., & Li, H. (2007). MOEA/D: A multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 11(6), 712–731. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2007.892759

Abido, M. A. (2009). A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on Latin hypercube sampling for environmental/economic dispatch. Electric Power Systems Research, 79(10), 1481–1488.

Li, K., Zhang, Q., & Kwong, S. (2009). A clustering-based multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for uniform Pareto front approximation. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 13(5), 1015–1034.

Gupta, A., & Deep, K. (2009). Adaptive SBX and polynomial mutation for NSGA-II in multi-objective optimization. Swarm and Evolutionary Computation, 16, 1–14.

Coello, C. A. C., Lamont, G. B., & Van Veldhuizen, D. A. (2007). Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems (pp. 53–89). Springer.

Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., & Fonseca, C. M. (2003). Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: An analysis and review. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 7(2), 117–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2003.810758

Arthur, D., & Vassilvitskii, S. (2007). K-means++: The advantages of careful seeding. In Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (pp. 1027–1035). SIAM.

Kennedy, J., & Eberhart, R. (1995). Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks (pp. 1942–1948). IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968

Deb, K., & Jain, H. (2014). An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based non-dominated sorting approach, Part I: Solving problems with box constraints. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 18(4), 577–601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2013.2281535

Zhang, Q., Liu, W., & Li, H. (2009). The performance of a new version of MOEA/D on CEC09 unconstrained MOP test instances. In Proceedings of the IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (pp. 203–208). IEEE. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2009.4982949

Zitzler, E., & Künzli, S. (2004). Indicator-based selection in multiobjective search. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving from Nature (pp. 832–842). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30217-9_84

Tian, Y., Cheng, R., Zhang, X., & Jin, Y. (2017). PlatEMO: A MATLAB platform for evolutionary multi-objective optimization. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 12(4), 73–87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCI.2017.2742868

Zheng, Y., Zhou, Y., & Meng, M. Q. H. (2014). Path planning for mobile robots in unknown environments using ant colony optimization. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 61(1), 515–526.

Downloads

How to Cite

Li, M., & Wen, M. (2026). Hybrid Selection and Adaptive Strategies with Clustering Strategies for Solving Multi-Objective Optimization Problems. Asia Pacific Economic and Management Review, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.62177/apemr.v3i3.1396

Issue

Section

Articles