Research on the Pathways, Policies, and Impacts of Biomanufacturing in Industrial Transformation and Upgrading
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62177/apemr.v3i1.1148Keywords:
Bioeconomy, Biomanufacturing, Industrial Transformation and Upgrading, Policy ResearchAbstract
As a disruptive paradigm of deep integration between biotechnology and advanced manufacturing, biomanufacturing is becoming a strategic engine for promoting green industrial transformation and cultivating new quality productive forces. This paper systematically studies the pathway mechanisms, policy frameworks, and comprehensive impacts of biomanufacturing in industrial transformation and upgrading. First, it constructs a "technology-industry-policy" co-evolution analysis framework to explain the internal mechanisms driving industrial transformation. Second, it identifies four core pathways: raw material substitution, process innovation, product upgrading, and system integration. Third, it conducts an in-depth analysis of the strategic orientation and implementation mechanisms of the "14th Five-Year" bioeconomy policy, evaluating the layout and synergistic effects of industrial clusters in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region, Yangtze River Delta, Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area, and Chengdu-Chongqing region. Finally, it systematically assesses the comprehensive impacts on industrial restructuring, industrial scale expansion, and sustainable development. The study finds that although China's biomanufacturing industry leads in market scale, it still faces challenges including core technology dependence, slow industrialization, insufficient cost competitiveness, incomplete standard systems, weak industrial ecosystems, and talent shortages. Based on this, the paper proposes recommendations for strengthening top-level design, breaking through key core technologies, improving industrial ecosystems, optimizing regional layout, strengthening talent cultivation, and deepening international cooperation, providing academic support and decision-making references for promoting high-quality development of China's bioeconomy.
Downloads
References
Philp, J. (2018). The bioeconomy, the challenge of the century for policy makers. New Biotechnology, 40, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.06.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.004
Tan, T. (2025). Biomanufacturing: Strategic engine and innovative practice for cultivating future industries. Science & Technology Review, 43(23), 1–2.
The White House. (2022). Executive order on advancing biotechnology and biomanufacturing innovation for a sustainable, safe, and secure American bioeconomy. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/presidential-actions/2022/09/12/executive-order-on-advancing-biotechnology-and-biomanufacturing-innovation-for-a-sustainable-safe-and-secure-american-bioeconomy/
National Development and Reform Commission. (2022). 14th Five-Year Plan for Bioeconomy Development.
Clomburg, J. M., Crumbley, A. M., & Gonzalez, R. (2017). Industrial biomanufacturing: The future of chemical production. Science, 355(6320), aag0804. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag0804
Miehe, R., Bauernhansl, T., Schwarz, O., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Fridgen, G. (2018). The biological transformation of the manufacturing industry—Envisioning biointelligent value adding. Procedia CIRP, 72, 739–743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.143
Xie, X., & Han, Y. (2022). How local manufacturing enterprises achieve "glamorous transformation" in green innovation: A multi-case study based on the attention-based view. Management World, 38(3), 76–106.
Zhou, S., Zhang, Y., Zhou, X., & Chen, B. (2025). A model of integration of technological innovation and industrial innovation: The evolution path and strategic choices of synthetic biology in China. Scientia Sinica Vitae, 55(10), 1957–1967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1360/SSV-2025-0242
Yun, H., Chen, B., & Tan, T. (2025). Progress and future trends of key biomanufacturing technologies in China. Science & Technology Review, 43(23), 24–32.
Pandey, K., Pandey, M., Kumar, V., & Kumar, R. (2024). Bioprocessing 4.0 in biomanufacturing: Paving the way for sustainable bioeconomy. Systems Microbiology and Biomanufacturing, 4, 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43393-024-00133-5
Aguilar, A., Twardowski, T., & Wohlgemuth, R. (2019). Bioeconomy for sustainable development. Biotechnology Journal, 14(1), 1800638. https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201800638 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201800638
Dietz, T., Börner, J., Förster, J. J., & Braun, J. (2018). Governance of the bioeconomy: A global comparative study of national bioeconomy strategies. Sustainability, 10(9), 3190. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093190 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093190
Wei, X., Luo, J., Pu, A., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, L. (2022). From biotechnology to bioeconomy: A review of development dynamics and pathways. Sustainability, 14(16), 10413. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su141610413
Ramcilovic-Suominen, S., & Pülzl, H. (2018). Sustainable development–A 'selling point' of the emerging EU bioeconomy policy framework? Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4179–4190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.005 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.157
Zhang, X., Zhao, C., Shao, M. W., Zhang, X., & Porter, A. L. (2022). The roadmap of bioeconomy in China. Engineering in Life Sciences, 22(1), 66–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202100058 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.202100058
Bracco, S., Calicioglu, O., Gomez San Juan, M., & Flammini, A. (2018). Assessing the contribution of bioeconomy to the total economy: A review of national frameworks. Sustainability, 10(6), 1698. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061698 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061698
Christensen, T., Philippidis, G., van Leeuwen, M., Topp, C. F. E., & Reidsma, P. (2022). Bridging modelling and policymaking efforts to realize the European bioeconomy. GCB Bioenergy, 14(9), 1038–1052. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12987 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12996
Töller, A. E., Vogelpohl, T., Beer, K., Pannicke, N., & Gawel, E. (2021). Is bioeconomy policy a policy field? A conceptual framework and findings on the European Union and Germany. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 23(5), 615–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1862986 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.1893163
Clomburg, J. M., Crumbley, A. M., & Gonzalez, R. (2017). Industrial biomanufacturing: The future of chemical production. Science, 355(6320), aag0804. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag0804 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag0804
Clarke, L., & Kitney, R. (2020). Developing synthetic biology for industrial biotechnology applications. Biochemical Society Transactions, 48(1), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20190349 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20190349
Pandey, K., Pandey, M., Kumar, V., & Kumar, R. (2024). Bioprocessing 4.0 in biomanufacturing: Paving the way for sustainable bioeconomy. Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 11(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40643-024-00751-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43393-023-00206-y
Miehe, R., Bauernhansl, T., Schwarz, O., Vogel-Heuser, B., & Fridgen, G. (2018). The biological transformation of the manufacturing industry—Envisioning biointelligent value adding. Procedia CIRP, 72, 739–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.03.143 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.04.085
Downloads
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Kehan Feng

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.











